Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotional modulation of statistical learning in visual search.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Stage-specific priming of pop-out effects in the target-feature memory encoding and retrieval.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Duration reproduction under memory pressure: Modeling the roles of visual memory set size in duration encoding and reproduction.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Distinct hippocampus codes for contextual cueing: learning contexts and their predictive associations with targets in visual search.

NeuroImage·2025
Same author

Distractors sharing critical target features summon, but do not engage, attention: An EEG study ☆.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Increasing Signal, Reducing Noise: Contrasting Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Visual Search.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

On the relation between spontaneous perspective taking and other visuospatial processes.

Jan Zwickel1, Hermann J Müller

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Leopoldstrasse 13, Munich, Germany. zwickel@psy.lmu.de

Memory & Cognition
|January 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Visuospatial tasks share processes. Spontaneous and instructed perspective-taking use similar orientation encoding, while body-part rotation involves motor processes, not orientation overlap.

More Related Videos

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Visuospatial tasks are crucial for understanding cognitive processes.
  • Different visuospatial paradigms may engage distinct cognitive mechanisms.
  • Clarifying these mechanisms enhances our understanding of spatial cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare processes underlying different visuospatial tasks.
  • To investigate the relationship between spontaneous and instructed perspective-taking.
  • To examine the link between perspective-taking and mental rotation of body-part and non-body-part objects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four common visuospatial research paradigms.
  • Participants viewed animations designed to elicit spontaneous perspective-taking.
  • Interference tasks measured reaction times during concurrent cognitive operations (Experiment 1-3).

Main Results:

  • Spontaneous and instructed perspective-taking showed interference, suggesting shared orientation encoding.
  • No interference was observed between spontaneous perspective-taking and non-body-part object rotation.
  • Spontaneous perspective-taking and body-part rotation did not share orientation representations but may involve similar motor processes.

Conclusions:

  • Perspective-taking and mental rotation are not monolithic processes.
  • Motor processes appear integral to both spontaneous perspective-taking and body-part mental rotation.
  • Findings support the role of motor systems in spatial cognition and perspective-taking.