Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
A logrank test-based method for sizing clinical trials with two co-primary time-to-event endpoints
Tomoyuki Sugimoto1, Takashi Sozu, Toshimitsu Hamasaki
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Science and Technology, 3 Bunkyocho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8561, Japan. tomoyuki@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp
Determining sample size for clinical trials with two correlated time-to-event endpoints is crucial. This study proposes methods to calculate sample sizes for comparing interventions, accounting for endpoint correlation using copula models and logrank statistics.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Survival Analysis
Background:
- Clinical trials often evaluate interventions using multiple co-primary endpoints.
- Time-to-event endpoints are common in many therapeutic areas, such as oncology and cardiology.
- The correlation between co-primary endpoints can significantly impact study power and sample size requirements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present methods for sample size determination in clinical trials with two correlated co-primary time-to-event endpoints.
- To provide a framework for accounting for endpoint correlation in sample size calculations.
- To evaluate the performance and behavior of the proposed sample size methods.
Main Methods:
- Utilized copula families to model the joint distribution of bivariate time-to-event endpoints.
- Specified a correlation structure for the bivariate logrank statistic to account for endpoint correlation.
- Employed simulation studies to assess the proposed sample size calculation methods and their sensitivity to correlation.
- Focused on a two-arm randomized trial design, the most common scenario.
Main Results:
- The proposed methods provide a means to calculate the necessary sample size when dealing with correlated co-primary time-to-event endpoints.
- Simulation results demonstrate the performance of the developed methods and illustrate the impact of correlation on required sample sizes.
- The study highlights the importance of explicitly modeling endpoint correlation for accurate sample size estimation.
Conclusions:
- Accurate sample size calculation is essential for the successful design of clinical trials with multiple correlated endpoints.
- The presented methods offer a practical approach for biostatisticians and clinical trial designers.
- Future research could extend these methods to more complex trial designs or endpoint structures.
Related Concept Videos
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

