Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Assays for the Specific Growth Rate and Cell-binding Ability of Rotavirus
Published on: January 28, 2019
Uptake of oral rotavirus vaccine and timeliness of routine immunization in Brazil's National Immunization Program
Brendan Flannery1, Samia Samad, José Cássio de Moraes
1US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States. bflannery@cdc.gov
Insights
Brazil
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Oral rotavirus vaccine introduced in Brazil in 2006 with age restrictions to mitigate intussusception risk.
- Coverage for rotavirus vaccine (83%) lagged behind other infant immunizations (≥94%) years after introduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze rotavirus vaccine uptake in Brazil.
- To compare rotavirus vaccine coverage with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTP-Hib) coverage.
- To identify factors associated with lower rotavirus vaccine uptake.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of national immunization program data on rotavirus vaccine (Rota1, Rota2) and DTP-Hib vaccine (DTP-Hib1, DTP-Hib2) coverage.
- Comparison of coverage differences in 27 Brazilian cities in 2010.
- Correlation of coverage gaps with delayed DTP-Hib vaccination.
Main Results:
- In 2010, DTP-Hib1 coverage was 99.0% vs. Rota1 at 95.2%; DTP-Hib2 coverage was 98.4% vs. Rota2 at 83.0%.
- Significant regional variations in coverage were observed.
- Coverage gaps correlated with delayed DTP-Hib vaccination, suggesting age restrictions impacted rotavirus vaccine uptake.
Conclusions:
- Age restrictions for rotavirus vaccination likely contributed to lower coverage.
- Strategies to improve immunization timeliness are crucial for maximizing rotavirus vaccine benefits.
- Continued monitoring of rotavirus vaccine uptake and intussusception risk is necessary.
Introduction:
In March, 2006, oral rotavirus vaccine was added to Brazil's infant immunization schedule with recommended upper age limits for initiating (by age 14 weeks) and completing (by age 24 weeks) the two-dose series to minimize age-specific risk of intussusception following rotavirus vaccination. Several years after introduction, estimated coverage with rotavirus vaccine (83%) was lower compared to coverage for other recommended childhood immunizations (≥94%).
Methods:
We analyzed data from Brazil's national immunization program on uptake of oral rotavirus vaccine by geographic region and compared administrative coverage estimates for first and second doses of oral rotavirus vaccine (Rota1 and Rota2) with first and second doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTP-Hib1 and DTP-Hib2). For 27 Brazilian cities, we compared differences between estimated rotavirus and DTP-Hib coverage in 2010 with delayed receipt of DTP-Hib vaccine among a cohort of children surveyed before rotavirus introduction.
Results:
In 2010, infant vaccination coverage was 99.0% for DTP-Hib1 versus 95.2% for Rota1 (3.8% difference), and 98.4% for DTP-Hib2 versus 83.0% for Rota2 (15.4% difference), with substantial regional variation. Differences between DTP-Hib and rotavirus vaccination coverage in Brazilian cities correlated with delay in DTP-Hib vaccination among children surveyed. Age restrictions for initiating and completing the rotavirus vaccination series likely contributed to lower coverage with rotavirus vaccine in Brazil.
Conclusion:
To maximize benefits of rotavirus vaccination, strategies are needed to improve timeliness of routine immunizations; monitoring rotavirus vaccine uptake and intussusception risk is needed to guide further recommendations for rotavirus vaccination.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Vaccines
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

