Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Which elements of improvement collaboratives are most effective? A cluster-randomized trial
David H Gustafson1, Andrew R Quanbeck, James M Robinson
1Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA. dhgustaf@wisc.edu
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
|January 16, 2013
Summary
Clinic-level coaching significantly reduced addiction treatment waiting times and increased new patient numbers. Other collaborative components did not add value, making coaching a more cost-effective improvement strategy.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Addiction Treatment
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Improvement collaboratives are widely used in healthcare to enhance quality.
- However, the specific components that are most effective within these collaboratives remain unidentified.
- This study specifically investigated components within addiction treatment services.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different components of improvement collaboratives in addiction treatment services.
- To determine which collaborative components are most effective in improving key performance indicators.
- To test the hypothesis that a combination of all components would yield the best results.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized trial involving 201 outpatient addiction treatment clinics across five states.
- Clinics were assigned to receive interest circle calls, clinic-level coaching, learning sessions, or a combination of all three interventions.
- Outcomes measured included waiting-time, patient retention, and the annual number of new patients, alongside cost-effectiveness analysis.
Main Results:
- Clinic-level coaching and the combination group significantly reduced waiting times.
- The coaching and combination groups also showed significant increases in the number of new patients.
- Interest circle calls did not demonstrate significant effects on any primary outcomes, and no group improved patient retention.
Conclusions:
- Clinic-level coaching is an effective strategy for improving waiting times and increasing patient volume in addiction treatment services.
- Other components, such as interest circle calls and learning sessions, did not appear to provide additional benefits.
- Coaching demonstrated comparable effectiveness to the full combination approach but was substantially more cost-effective.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
01:13Randomized Experiments
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
01:16Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
01:20Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
01:11Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
01:28Methods of Medium Optimization
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...