Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

05:28
Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors
Published on: May 12, 2022
Progress towards malaria control targets in relation to national malaria programme funding
Eline L Korenromp1, Mehran Hosseini, Robert D Newman
1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ekorenromp@orange.fr
Malaria Journal
|January 16, 2013
Summary
Increased malaria funding, particularly from international donors, is linked to significant progress in malaria control. Strategic reallocation of funds to countries with the greatest need can maximize impact and accelerate progress towards global targets.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Malaria control efforts have intensified globally, driven by increased international donor financing since 2003.
- This study evaluates malaria control progress up to 2010 against global targets.
- The assessment considers malaria program financing from the Global Fund, other donors, and domestic sources between 2003 and 2009.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the relationship between malaria program financing and progress towards global malaria control targets.
- To analyze the impact of donor funding on insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) coverage and reductions in malaria case incidence and mortality.
- To identify opportunities for optimizing donor funding allocation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized domestic malaria financing data from national programs and Global Fund/OECD data for donor financing in 90 endemic countries.
- Incorporated WHO estimates of ITN ownership in sub-Saharan Africa.
- Used WHO-estimated malaria case incidence and deaths for countries outside sub-Saharan Africa.
Main Results:
- Donor funding, from the Global Fund and other sources, is concentrated in highly endemic African countries and those with the highest malaria burden outside Africa.
- Countries receiving higher donor funding per capita showed greater increases in ITN coverage (Africa) and larger declines in malaria case and death rates (outside Africa).
- Malaria program funding per case or death averted was more favorable in countries with higher per capita donor funding.
Conclusions:
- Increased malaria program funding correlates with accelerated progress toward malaria control objectives.
- Evidence suggests that strategic reallocation of donor funding to countries with the highest ongoing need can enhance ITN coverage and reduce malaria morbidity and mortality.
- Optimizing donor funding impact requires focusing resources on areas with the greatest malaria burden and need.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Symbiosis
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Anthelminthic Agents
Anthelmintic drugs differ significantly from antiparasitic therapies targeting protozoa, primarily due to differences in parasite biology. Whereas most protozoal treatments act on proliferating cells, anthelmintics are typically directed against mature, nonproliferative helminths. The therapeutic approach considers the helminth's reliance on neuromuscular coordination, glucose metabolism, and microtubular integrity for survival, reproduction, and localization within the host. Most anthelmintics...

