Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

07:13
Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
Liver fibrosis evaluation using real-time shear wave elastography: applicability and diagnostic performance using
Thierry Poynard1, Mona Munteanu, Elena Luckina
1Hepato-Gastroenterology, APHP UPMC Liver Center, Paris, France. tpoynard@teaser.fr
Journal of Hepatology
|January 17, 2013
Summary
Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) shows promise for diagnosing liver fibrosis, performing comparably to other methods for cirrhosis detection. However, its applicability is lower than FibroTest, except in patients with ascites.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Biomarkers
Background:
- Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) is an emerging 2D transient elastography technique.
- Limited data exists on SWE's reliability factors and comparisons with established fibrosis biomarkers.
- Validated biomarkers include FibroTest (FT) and transient elastography (TE) with M and XL probes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic applicability and performance of SWE for liver fibrosis.
- To compare SWE against FibroTest (FT) and transient elastography (TE-M, TE-XL) for fibrosis assessment.
Main Methods:
- Strength of concordance, discordance analysis, and latent class analysis (LCM) were employed due to the absence of a gold standard.
- 422 patients were included in the study.
- Applicability and diagnostic performance metrics were compared across SWE, FT, TE-M, and TE-XL.
Main Results:
- SWE applicability (90.0%) was lower than FT (97.9%) but comparable to TE-M (90.5%) and TE-XL (90.3%).
- SWE showed higher applicability (86%) than TE-M (55%) in patients with ascites.
- SWE performance (Obuchowski measure 0.807) was significant for all fibrosis stages but lower than TE-M (0.852) and TE-XL (0.834); it struggled to differentiate F0 from F1.
- For cirrhosis diagnosis via LCM, SWE specificity was 99%, with sensitivities ranging from 0.47 to 0.64.
Conclusions:
- SWE demonstrates diagnostic performance for cirrhosis comparable to FT and TE.
- SWE applicability is less than FT but superior to TE in patients with ascites.
- Further evaluation is needed for SWE's utility in non-cirrhotic stages.
