Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends and Regional Variation in Heat-Related EMS Encounters in the US.

Prehospital emergency care·2026
Same author

Relationship between Rate of Hypernatremia Correction and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients.

Kidney360·2025
Same author

Development of new bilingual oral health behavior social support (OHBSS) scales in English and Spanish.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The effects of bystander interventions for foreign body airway obstruction on survival and neurological outcomes: Findings of the MOCHI registry.

Resuscitation·2024
Same author

Ambulance Traffic Crashes in Japan: Characteristics of Casualties and Efforts to Improve Ambulance Safety.

Prehospital emergency care·2024
Same author

Study on MEV90 of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided caudal epidural block in anorectal surgery.

Frontiers in medicine·2023
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Bayesian nonparametric centered random effects models with variable selection.

Mingan Yang1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. minganyang@gmail.com

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|January 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian variable selection method using Dirichlet processes for nonparametric random effects models. This approach addresses normality assumption violations and bias in linear mixed effects models, improving interpretation and accuracy.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Parametric assumptions (e.g., normal distribution) for random effects in linear mixed effects models can lead to errors in variable selection.
  • Nonparametric models with nonzero mean random effects face identifiability issues for fixed effects.
  • Existing methods may struggle with accurate variable selection when normality assumptions are violated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Bayesian variable selection method for linear mixed effects models.
  • To address challenges posed by non-normal and potentially nonzero mean random effects.
  • To improve the accuracy and interpretability of model selection in complex data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian approach with Dirichlet process priors for nonparametric characterization of subject-specific random effects.
  • Developed a method to simultaneously resolve bias and model the conditional distribution of random effects flexibly.
  • Employed a stochastic search Gibbs sampler for efficient identification of relevant fixed and random effects.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian method effectively handles violations of normality assumptions in random effects.
  • The approach successfully addresses identifiability problems associated with nonzero mean random effects.
  • Simulations demonstrated superior performance compared to existing variable selection techniques.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian nonparametric approach offers a robust solution for variable selection in linear mixed effects models.
  • This method enhances model interpretability and accuracy, particularly when standard assumptions are not met.
  • The approach is validated through simulations and a real-world application in a rodent bioassay.