Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pollination and Flower Structure02:40

Pollination and Flower Structure

81.2K
Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.  
81.2K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

6.0K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
6.0K
Echo01:06

Echo

1.2K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.2K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.5K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divergent population trajectories despite similar response to temperature in a widespread aerial insectivore.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Hypertension in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: progress made, gaps remain.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Bioaccumulation of trace elements by Leach's storm-petrels (Hydrobates leucorhous) in the North and South Atlantic Ocean during the non-breeding period.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same author

Female Dahl, but Not SS13<sup>BN</sup>, Rats Are Susceptible to High-Fat Diet-Induced Hypertension.

Research square·2026
Same author

Aerial hawking in a gleaning specialist bat (Trachops cirrhosus) does not involve a high-resolution buzz.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Inhibition of NLRP3 Differentially Regulates Blood Pressure and Inflammation in Male versus Female DOCA-Salt Sprague Dawley Rats.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds
13:05

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.9K

Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Patricia L Jones1, Hamilton E Farris, Michael J Ryan

  • 1Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA. patricia.jones@utexas.edu

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|January 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Male túngara frogs

More Related Videos

Physiological Preparation of Hair Cells from the Sacculus of the American Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana
12:07

Physiological Preparation of Hair Cells from the Sacculus of the American Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana

Published on: March 17, 2017

17.4K
Reproductive Techniques for Ovarian Monitoring and Control in Amphibians
04:37

Reproductive Techniques for Ovarian Monitoring and Control in Amphibians

Published on: May 12, 2019

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds
13:05

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.9K
Physiological Preparation of Hair Cells from the Sacculus of the American Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana
12:07

Physiological Preparation of Hair Cells from the Sacculus of the American Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana

Published on: March 17, 2017

17.4K
Reproductive Techniques for Ovarian Monitoring and Control in Amphibians
04:37

Reproductive Techniques for Ovarian Monitoring and Control in Amphibians

Published on: May 12, 2019

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Bioacoustics
  • Animal Communication
  • Neuroethology

Background:

  • Male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) produce complex mating calls with whine and chuck components.
  • These calls attract both females and predators like the frog-eating bat (Trachops cirrhosus).
  • Female frogs perceive the whine and chuck as a unified signal, even when separated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if frog-eating bats auditorily group túngara frog call components similarly to frogs.
  • To compare the auditory processing of conspecific signals between a prey species and its predator.
  • To understand how evolutionary history shapes signal perception in different taxa.

Main Methods:

  • Acoustic playback experiments were conducted with túngara frogs and frog-eating bats.
  • The responses of bats to isolated whine and chuck components, and to temporally separated components, were recorded.
  • Bat phonotaxis towards different call variations was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Unlike frogs, bats approached chucks broadcast alone.
  • Bats preferentially approached the whine when it was spatially separated from the chuck.
  • Bats demonstrated sensitivity to the temporal sequence of whine and chuck components.

Conclusions:

  • Despite responding to the same signal, bats and frogs exhibit different auditory grouping of túngara frog call components.
  • Evolutionary divergence in selective pressures and neural architecture leads to distinct signal processing between predators and prey.
  • This highlights how different species may evolve to perceive and prioritize different aspects of the same communication signal.