Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Bayesian methods to determine performance differences and to quantify variability among centers in multi-center
Emine O Bayman1, Kathryn M Chaloner, Bradley J Hindman
1Department of Anesthesia, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. emine-bayman@uiowa.edu
This study used Bayesian hierarchical models to analyze center performance variability in clinical trials. No outlying centers were found in the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial, despite moderate variability.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Assessing variability in clinical trial outcomes across different centers is crucial for quality control.
- Identifying outlier centers can help improve patient care and trial efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify inter-center variability in primary outcomes using a novel statistical approach.
- To develop a guideline for identifying outlier centers in clinical trials.
- To apply these methods to the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial (IHAST).
Main Methods:
- Employed Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate center-specific effects on treatment outcomes.
- Utilized outlier detection methods assuming exchangeable center effects.
- Adjusted analyses for patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment variables.
Main Results:
- Center-to-center variation in favorable outcomes was consistent with a normal distribution (posterior sd = 0.538).
- No centers were identified as definitive outliers based on the proposed guideline.
- Center characteristics did not predict outcomes, but patient and disease factors did.
Conclusions:
- Bayesian hierarchical methods effectively assess center performance and identify predictors of outcome, even with small sample sizes.
- The IHAST demonstrated moderate variability between centers, but no centers were found to be outliers.
- These methods enhance the ability to monitor and improve clinical trial conduct across multiple sites.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

