Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Cigarette Smoke Exposure in Mice using a Whole-Body Inhalation System
Published on: October 22, 2020
Including the smoking epidemic in internationally coherent mortality projections
Fanny Janssen1, Leo J G van Wissen, Anton E Kunst
1Population Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. f.janssen@rug.nl
Abstract:
We present a new mortality projection methodology that distinguishes smoking- and non-smoking-related mortality and takes into account mortality trends of the opposite sex and in other countries. We evaluate to what extent future projections of life expectancy at birth (e 0) for the Netherlands up to 2040 are affected by the application of these components. All-cause mortality and non-smoking-related mortality for the years 1970-2006 are projected by the Lee-Carter and Li-Lee methodologies. Smoking-related mortality is projected according to assumptions on future smoking-attributable mortality. Projecting all-cause mortality in the Netherlands, using the Lee-Carter model, leads to high gains in e 0 (4.1 for males; 4.4 for females) and divergence between the sexes. Coherent projections, which include the mortality experience of the other 21 sex- and country-specific populations, result in much higher gains for males (6.4) and females (5.7), and convergence. The separate projection of smoking and non-smoking-related mortality produces a steady increase in e 0 for males (4.8) and a nonlinear trend for females, with lower gains in e 0 in the short run, resulting in temporary sex convergence. The latter effect is also found in coherent projections. Our methodology provides more robust projections, especially thanks to the distinction between smoking- and non-smoking-related mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Causality in Epidemiology
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

