Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
The impact of medical errors on physician behavior: evidence from malpractice litigation
1Department of Economics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. ity.shurtz@mail.huji.ac.il
Abstract:
How do medical errors affect physician behavior? Despite the importance of this question empirical evidence about it remains limited. This paper studies the impact of obstetricians' medical errors that resulted in malpractice litigation on their subsequent choice of whether to perform a C-section, a common procedure that is thought to be sensitive to physician incentives. The main result is that C-section rates jumped discontinuously by 4% after a medical error, establishing an association between medical errors and treatment patterns. C-section rates continued to increase afterwards, bringing the cumulative increase 2.5 years after a medical error to 8%.
Insights
Medical errors significantly alter physician behavior. Following a malpractice lawsuit, obstetricians increased Cesarean section (C-section) rates by 4%, with continued increases observed over time.
Area of Science:
- Medical malpractice
- Physician behavior studies
- Health economics
Background:
- Limited empirical evidence exists on how medical errors influence physician decision-making.
- Understanding this impact is crucial for patient safety and healthcare quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of medical errors, specifically those leading to malpractice litigation, on obstetricians' C-section rates.
- To determine if past medical errors alter subsequent treatment patterns.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of obstetricians' medical errors resulting in malpractice litigation.
- Examination of changes in C-section rates before and after medical errors.
- Statistical analysis to establish associations between errors and treatment choices.
Main Results:
- A 4% discontinuous jump in C-section rates was observed immediately following a medical error.
- C-section rates continued to rise post-error, reaching an 8% cumulative increase 2.5 years later.
- Establishes a clear association between medical errors and shifts in physician treatment patterns.
Conclusions:
- Medical errors and subsequent malpractice litigation demonstrably impact physician behavior.
- Obstetricians' C-section practices are sensitive to incentives and past error experiences.
- Findings suggest potential defensive medicine practices influencing common procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts II
Ethics and Bioethics
Obedience
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...