Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources
Published on: October 6, 2023
The value of a quality improvement programme for panoramic radiography: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Michael N Rushton1, Vivian E Rushton, Helen V Worthington
1Little Budworth, Cheshire CW6 9DA, United Kingdom.
Objectives:
To assess the value of a quality improvement programme for panoramic radiography.
Methods:
A prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 40 dental practices in England. Practices were randomly assigned into two groups, an 'active' practice receiving regular feedback on film quality and a 'control' practice receiving no feedback until the completion of the study.
Results:
800 panoramic radiographs were examined for technical and processing faults. Following the first feedback to the 'active' practices, 100 films showed that the films taken were a significant predictor of a reduction in the number of technical (effect coefficient 0.51 (standard error SE 0.06); P<0.001) and processing (effect coefficient 0.42 (SE 0.08); P<0.001) faults compared to those in 'control' practices (n=400). The 'active' practices continued to benefit from the second round of feedback, showing a marked reduction in technical (effect coefficient 1.31 (SE 0.06); P<0.001) and processing (effect coefficient 1.18 (SE 0.11); P<0.001) faults. Two months after completion of the study, a further 120 panoramic radiographs from 12 practices in each group were examined for quality. Significant differences between the two groups for both technical faults (effect coefficient 0.62 (SE 0.22); P=0.02) and processing faults (effect coefficient 0.65 (SE 0.17); P<0.001) were found.
Conclusions:
This cluster randomised controlled trial showed that distance feedback is an effective method in instructing dental practitioners to correct technical and processing errors experienced in producing panoramic radiographs. This intervention was effective in the short term whilst the practitioners were actively receiving feedback and for 8 weeks afterwards.
Clinical Significance:
Panoramic radiography quality is often poor due to a lack of knowledge of correct patient positioning. A failure to comply with manufacturers' instructions regarding the changing frequency for processing chemistry also compounds the problem. Distant feedback is effective in improving film quality in the short term and after 8 weeks.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...