Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Blinding
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Long-term safety and tolerability of bimagrumab (BYM338) in sporadic inclusion body myositis.
Improvement of distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy after exposure to factor Xa inhibitor.
Withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment.
Variability in the Perception of Informed Consent for IV-tPA during Telestroke Consultation.
Associations of neuropathic pain and pain catastrophizing with rehabilitation outcomes in patients with stroke.
Education level amplifies the mediating pathway of rehabilitation motivation between metacognition and quality of life in stroke survivors.
Cortical activation and functional connectivity during thumb-to-finger opposition in patients with stroke with varying functional levels: insights from fNIRS.
Cognitive strategies for improving activity-level outcomes post stroke: an integrative review.
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with soft robotic glove training for slight-to-moderate post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a randomized controlled trial.
Common coping and collaborative management of stroke survivors' spousal caregivers: a moderated mediation model of illness perception and resilience.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017
Off-protocol access to study therapies.
1Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Researchers explored the ethics of off-protocol access to study therapies like recombinant factor VIIa for intracerebral hemorrhage. This therapy was later found ineffective, raising questions about patient consent and trial integrity.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
08:18A Protocol for the Use of Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Published on: December 26, 2015
Area of Science:
- Clinical Ethics
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Ethical considerations arise regarding patient access to investigational therapies outside of clinical trial protocols.
- Recombinant factor VIIa (rVIIa) was studied for treating intracerebral hemorrhage, a condition with high mortality and morbidity.
- Clinical trials necessitate rigorous adherence to protocols to ensure data integrity and patient safety.
Observation:
- Researchers faced ethical dilemmas concerning off-protocol administration of rVIIa to critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
- The equipoise principle, questioning patient indifference between treatment and placebo, was a central ethical challenge.
- The potential for perceived benefit, even if later disproven, complicated decisions about treatment allocation.
Findings:
- Recombinant factor VIIa was ultimately found to be ineffective for treating intracerebral hemorrhage.
- The ethical debate centered on whether patients could provide informed consent when uncertain about treatment efficacy.
- The struggle to balance patient well-being with the need for unbiased trial data was significant.
Implications:
- The findings highlight the complexities of ethical decision-making in clinical research, particularly with critically ill populations.
- Clear guidelines are needed for managing off-protocol requests and ensuring patient-centered care within research.
- This case underscores the importance of ongoing ethical review and adaptation in response to emerging scientific evidence.