Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026
Improved Hysteroscopic Resection of Endometrial Polyps Using 6-Fr Micro-Scissors and Forceps
Published on: August 2, 2024
Value of 3-dimensional and power Doppler sonography for diagnosis of endometrial polyps
Lanlan Fang1, Yingchun Su, Yihong Guo
1Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Objectives:
To investigate whether the endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and endometrial and subendometrial vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization-flow index were useful for diagnosing endometrial polyps in infertility.
Methods:
Transvaginal and 3-dimesional power Doppler sonography was performed to calculate the endometrial echogenicity, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and endometrial and subendometrial vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization-flow index, followed by hysteroscopy in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (postmenstrual days 3-7). A total of 555 patients were selected, and 4 groups were defined according to the comparison of sonographic and hysteroscopic diagnoses: group A (sonographically positive but hysteroscopically negative), group B (sonographically and hysteroscopically negative), group C (sonographically negative but hysteroscopically positive), and group D (sonographically and hysteroscopically positive).
Results:
A total of 426 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. Significantly higher endometrial thickness and volume were found in groups C and D compared with groups A and B (P < .05). There were no significant differences among the 4 groups in terms of the endometrial and subendometrial vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization-flow index (P > .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of endometrial thickness and volume in predicting endometrial polyps were 62.7%, 69.8%, 26.9%, and 91.9% and 39.3%, 88.2%, 35.8%, and 89.7%, respectively. Combined sonographic evaluation (sonographic echogenicity, endometrial thickness, and endometrial volume) showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (65.6%, 89.0%, 50.0%, and 93.9%) compared with a single indicator.
Conclusions:
A combination of endometrial echogenicity, thickness, and volume on sonography may be better than a single indicator for predicting endometrial polyps in infertility. However, the endometrial or subendometrial vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization-flow index are not useful for prediction.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.