Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Monitoring Protein Adsorption with Solid-state Nanopores
Published on: December 2, 2011
Fast translocation of proteins through solid state nanopores
Calin Plesa1, Stefan W Kowalczyk, Ruben Zinsmeester
1Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands.
Protein translocation through solid-state nanopores shows unexpectedly low event rates, especially for smaller proteins. This anomaly is attributed to detection limits, impacting protein characterization via nanopores.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Nanotechnology
- Materials Science
Background:
- Solid-state nanopores offer a promising platform for single-molecule analysis, including protein translocation.
- Theoretical models predict specific capture rates based on protein size and diffusion, but experimental data often deviates.
- Anomalous transport behavior in nanopore systems can hinder accurate characterization of biomolecules.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reasons behind the observed low event rates during protein translocation through solid-state nanopores.
- To systematically study the dependence of translocation event rates on protein size, diffusion constant, pore size, and concentration.
- To identify the primary factors contributing to the discrepancy between theoretical predictions and experimental observations.
Main Methods:
- Experimental measurements of protein translocation event rates across a range of protein sizes (6-660 kDa) and concentrations.
- Systematic variation of nanopore dimensions and protein diffusion constants.
- Analysis of event rate dependence on protein size and diffusion using a one-dimensional first-passage time-distribution model.
Main Results:
- Observed event rates are significantly lower than theoretically predicted, particularly for smaller, faster-diffusing proteins.
- The discrepancy between observed and predicted rates increases with decreasing protein size.
- A large protein (540 kDa) exhibited behavior closer to theoretical expectations compared to a small protein (37 kDa).
Conclusions:
- The anomalous transport behavior is primarily attributed to the limited temporal resolution and low signal-to-noise ratio of the detection system.
- Many proteins translocate faster than the current detection capabilities allow, leading to underestimation of event rates.
- Addressing these detection limitations is crucial for advancing protein characterization using solid-state nanopore technology.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Diffusion in the Membrane
Overview of Protein Sorting and Transport
Protein sorting can be of two types: signal-based sorting and vesicle-based trafficking. In signal-based sorting, specific amino acid sequences called sorting signals target proteins to the proper location inside the cell either via gated transport or by protein translocation. In gated transport, folded...
Nuclear Protein Sorting
Proteins targeted to the nucleus carry nuclear localization signals or NLS recognized by import receptors in the cytosol. Similarly, proteins with nuclear export signals are recognized by export receptors. Import and export receptors are...
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
Facilitated Transport
Facilitated Transport

