Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism01:22

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism

Parasitism is a form of microbial interaction in which parasitic microbes exploit a host organism for nutrients and shelter, often at the host's expense. Unlike mutualistic relationships, where both organisms benefit, parasitism benefits only the parasite and harms the host.Classification of ParasitesMicrobial parasites are broadly classified based on their location relative to the host.Ectoparasites remain on the host’s surface, such as the skin or outer tissues, drawing nutrients...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impacts of artificial light at night on interactions between four trematode parasites and their marine invertebrate hosts: species-specific effects?

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Comparison of Detection Rates of Toxoplasma gondii among Five Host Tissues and Two Primer Sets in Three Bird Species.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2026
Same author

Drivers of Microbiome Composition Among Helminth Parasites Sharing the Same Insectivorous Bat Host.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same author

Comparative genomics of parasitoid lifestyle as exemplified by Mermithidae and Nematomorpha.

Journal of invertebrate pathology·2026
Same author

Let's ask again: are there general laws in parasite ecology?

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same author

Scientists' Warning on the Rapid Evolution of Parasites in the Anthropocene.

Evolutionary applications·2026
Same journal

Schistosomal circulating anodic antigen dynamics pre- and post-treatment in preschool aged children from the PIP trial in Uganda.

Parasitology·2026
Same journal

Rapid diagnostic assay distinguishing the snail vectors <i>Bulinus globosus</i> and <i>Bulinus nasutus</i> for urogenital schistosomiasis transmission risk mapping in East Africa.

Parasitology·2026
Same journal

Identification and coregulation pattern analysis of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse macrophages after Leishmania donovani infection.

Parasitology·2026
Same journal

Persistent intestinal schistosomiasis and progressive liver fibrosis in semi-captive chimpanzees: A 12-year epidemiological follow-up in Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary, Lake Victoria, Uganda.

Parasitology·2026
Same journal

Parasites of a keystone megaherbivore: insights into trematode life cycles and biological invasions in the Greater Kruger ecosystem.

Parasitology·2026
Same journal

Integrative description of <i>Udonella umgibeli</i> n. sp. (Monopisthocotylea: Udonellidae) as an epibiont of <i>Caligus tetrodontis</i> Barnard, 1948, off the coast of South Africa.

Parasitology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Using Single-Worm Data to Quantify Heterogeneity in Caenorhabditis elegans-Bacterial Interactions
09:54

Using Single-Worm Data to Quantify Heterogeneity in Caenorhabditis elegans-Bacterial Interactions

Published on: July 22, 2022

Explaining variability in parasite aggregation levels among host samples.

Robert Poulin1

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. robert.poulin@otago.ac.nz

Parasitology
|January 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Parasite aggregation in fish is primarily driven by infection levels, not host size or parasite type. Most variation in parasite distribution is explained by infection intensity, with few other factors significantly impacting aggregation patterns.

More Related Videos

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:50

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: October 14, 2021

Phenotypic Analysis of Rodent Malaria Parasite Asexual and Sexual Blood Stages and Mosquito Stages
08:23

Phenotypic Analysis of Rodent Malaria Parasite Asexual and Sexual Blood Stages and Mosquito Stages

Published on: May 30, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Using Single-Worm Data to Quantify Heterogeneity in Caenorhabditis elegans-Bacterial Interactions
09:54

Using Single-Worm Data to Quantify Heterogeneity in Caenorhabditis elegans-Bacterial Interactions

Published on: July 22, 2022

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:50

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: October 14, 2021

Phenotypic Analysis of Rodent Malaria Parasite Asexual and Sexual Blood Stages and Mosquito Stages
08:23

Phenotypic Analysis of Rodent Malaria Parasite Asexual and Sexual Blood Stages and Mosquito Stages

Published on: May 30, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Parasitology
  • Zoology

Background:

  • Metazoan parasite populations commonly exhibit aggregated distributions among individual hosts.
  • Host heterogeneity in parasite exposure or susceptibility is a primary driver of this aggregation.
  • Parasite characteristics also contribute to observed variability in aggregation levels across species.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of host body size variation and parasite characteristics (taxon, developmental stage) on helminth parasite aggregation in fish.
  • To determine the extent to which these factors explain the aggregated distribution of parasites within host populations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 410 fish host samples infected with helminth parasites.
  • Regression analysis of log-transformed variance against log mean parasite numbers to assess aggregation levels.
  • Mixed-effects modeling to evaluate the impact of host body size variation, parasite taxon, and developmental stage on parasite aggregation.

Main Results:

  • A strong relationship (r²=0.88) was found between mean infection levels and parasite aggregation, indicating aggregation is constrained by infection intensity.
  • Within-sample variation in host body size, parasite taxon, and developmental stage did not significantly affect parasite aggregation levels.
  • The number of hosts examined per sample, and species- and study-specific effects, accounted for much of the remaining variability in aggregation among samples.

Conclusions:

  • Parasite aggregation levels in fish are predominantly determined by mean infection intensity.
  • Host susceptibility and parasite-specific traits play a minor role in explaining aggregation patterns.
  • Future research should consider system-specific factors rather than seeking universal causes for remaining variation in parasite aggregation.