Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Towards a general model of temporal discounting.
Wouter van den Bos1, Samuel M McClure
1Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|January 25, 2013
Summary
The dominant hyperbolic model of temporal discounting is insufficient for explaining complex human behaviors. A new neuroscience-based model is proposed to better describe intertemporal preferences and integrate diverse findings.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Classical economic theory fails to explain common behaviors like impulsivity.
- The current dominant hyperbolic model of temporal discounting is increasingly inadequate.
- Diverse factors and independent theoretical constructs challenge existing models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the limitations of the hyperbolic discounting model.
- To propose a new, more comprehensive model for time discounting.
- To integrate disparate findings in the literature on intertemporal preferences.
Main Methods:
- Critically analyzed existing psychological and economic models of temporal discounting.
- Reviewed recent advancements in cognitive neuroscience relevant to time preferences.
- Synthesized empirical data and theoretical constructs from various fields.
Main Results:
- Hyperbolic discounting, while useful quantitatively, is insufficient as a descriptive psychological model.
- Emerging data from cognitive neuroscience offer a foundation for a general model of time discounting.
- A neuroscience-based approach can integrate diverse empirical data and theoretical models.
Conclusions:
- The hyperbolic model is strained by factors it cannot incorporate.
- A new general model of time discounting is needed.
- Cognitive neuroscience provides a promising framework for developing this new model.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Counterfactual Thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

