Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Published on: August 11, 2015
MRI comes of age in RA clinical trials
Charles Peterfy1, Mikkel Østergaard, Philip G Conaghan
1Spire Sciences, LLC, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract:
The success of modern rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies and treatment strategies has led to extended placebo phases being unethical in RA randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Modern trials therefore increasingly involve active comparator designs, and this together with some technical issues has meant difficulties in differentiating structural progression using traditional radiographic outcome measures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to assess damage more sensitively than radiographs, but importantly it can measure the upstream drivers of erosions and cartilage loss, synovitis and osteitis. An increasing number of recent RCTs using the RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) have demonstrated the ability of MRI to discriminate progression and treatment effect. Consistency of erosion progression determination was seen across the majority of these studies. In most studies, MRI demonstrated reduction in synovitis and osteitis at early (12 week) timepoints, and MRI predicted subsequent radiographic findings. Often small numbers of patients were required to demonstrate such changes. The time is right for regulatory authorities to include MRI as an alternative to radiographic data in support of claims of inhibition of progression of structural damage in RA trials.
Insights
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a sensitive method for tracking rheumatoid arthritis (RA) progression in clinical trials. MRI can detect early structural damage and treatment effects, supporting its use over traditional radiography.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Medical Imaging
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Modern rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies limit placebo use in trials.
- Traditional radiography struggles to differentiate structural progression in RA.
- Active comparator designs are increasingly used in RA randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in assessing structural progression in RA.
- To determine if MRI can serve as a sensitive outcome measure in RA clinical trials.
- To advocate for the regulatory acceptance of MRI in RA trial data.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent RA randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing the RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS).
- Analysis of MRI's ability to detect synovitis, osteitis, erosions, and cartilage loss.
- Comparison of MRI sensitivity against traditional radiographic measures.
Main Results:
- MRI demonstrated higher sensitivity in assessing joint damage compared to radiographs.
- MRI effectively measured upstream drivers of structural damage like synovitis and osteitis.
- MRI detected significant treatment effects and disease progression at early timepoints (12 weeks).
- MRI findings often predicted subsequent radiographic progression, requiring smaller patient cohorts.
Conclusions:
- MRI, particularly using RAMRIS, is a sensitive tool for evaluating RA progression and treatment efficacy.
- The ability of MRI to detect early changes supports its use in RA clinical trials.
- Regulatory authorities should consider MRI as an alternative to radiography for substantiating claims of structural damage inhibition in RA.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
