Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX: a meta-analysis of the published research
Ahmed Al Ansari1, Syeda Kauser Ali, Tyrone Donnon
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, Riffa, Bahrain.
Purpose:
To conduct a meta-analysis of published studies to determine the construct and criterion validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) to measure clinical performance.
Method:
The authors included all peer-reviewed studies published from 1995 to 2012 that reported the relationship between participants' performance on the mini-CEX and on other standardized academic and clinical performance measures. Moderator variables and performance and standardized exam measures were extracted and reviewed independently using a standardized coding protocol.
Results:
Performance measures from 11 studies were identified. A random-effects model of weighted mean effect size differences (d) resulted in: (1) construct validity coefficients for the mini-CEX on the trainees' performance across different residency year levels ranging from d=0.25 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.04-0.46) to d=0.50 (95% CI: 0.31-0.70), and (2) concurrent validity coefficients for the mini-CEX based on personnel ratings ranging from d=0.23 (95% CI: 0.04-0.50) to d=0.50 (95% CI: 0.34-0.65). Also, a random-effects model of weighted correlation effect size differences (r) resulted in predictive validity coefficients for the mini-CEX on trainees' performance across different standardized measures ranging from r=0.26 (95% CI: 0.16-0.35) to r=0.85 (95% CI: 0.47-0.96).
Conclusions:
The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX was supported by small to large effect size differences based on measures between trainees' achievement and clinical skills performance, indicating that it is an important instrument for the direct observation of trainees' clinical performance.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
