Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study
B Knäusl1, I F Rausch, H Bergmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Austria. barbara.knaeusl@meduniwien.ac.at
New point-spread-function (PSF) TrueX PET reconstruction offers better image quality but requires lower thresholds for accurate tumor delineation compared to OSEM. Verification across scanners is needed for multicenter trials.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiotherapy Physics
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- Functional imaging, particularly Positron Emission Tomography (PET), is increasingly vital in modern radiotherapy (RT).
- Automated integration of PET into target definition necessitates reliable PET quantification.
- New PET scanners utilize point-spread-function (PSF) based resolution recovery, but its impact on quantification needs investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of PSF-based reconstruction algorithms on PET quantification.
- To compare the performance of OSEM and PSF TrueX algorithms in PET imaging.
- To determine appropriate thresholds for accurate tumor delineation with PSF reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Siemens PET/CT phantom measurements with varying activity.
- Reconstruction using OSEM (Gauss filter) and PSF TrueX (Gauss/Allpass filters) with varied iterations (i) and subsets (ss).
- Comparison of recovery coefficient (RC) and volume threshold; analysis of eight lung patient scans.
Main Results:
- PSF TrueX demonstrated lower thresholds (up to 40%) than OSEM for defining real sphere volumes.
- TrueX showed higher sensitivity to iteration/subset variations; OSEM's RC stabilized with increasing iterations.
- Adapted thresholds and activity correction reduced volume and activity differences between TrueX and OSEM in patient scans.
Conclusions:
- PSF TrueX offers excellent diagnostic image quality but requires extended guidelines for PSF-based methods.
- A lower threshold than the 42% for OSEM is necessary for TrueX to ensure appropriate tumor delineation.
- Filter-dependent thresholds for TrueX must be verified on different scanners before multicenter trial implementation.
More Related Videos
08:36Multi-Tracer Studies of Brain Oxygen and Glucose Metabolism Using a Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scanner
Published on: June 7, 2024
08:41Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
Published on: July 14, 2020