Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins02:36

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards a decentralized future for open-science databases.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Erratum: Placental epigenetic clocks derived from crowdsourcing: Implications for the study of accelerated aging in obstetrics.

iScience·2026
Same author

Benchmarking large language models for predictive modeling in biomedical research with a focus on reproductive health.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Microbiome preterm birth DREAM challenge: Crowdsourcing machine learning approaches to advance preterm birth research.

Cell reports. Medicine·2025
Same author

Accurate affinity models for SH2 domains from peptide binding assays and free-energy regression.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025
Same author

A decentralized future for the open-science databases.

ArXiv·2025
Same journal

Author Correction: Improved RNA base editing with guide RNAs mimicking highly edited endogenous ADAR substrates.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Unlocking the chemical potential of filamentous fungi using prime editing.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

A genome-scale CRISPRi perturbation atlas of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Prime editing for precise genome engineering and modulation of fungal metabolism.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Retargeted serine integrases for one-step, precise integration of large DNA sequences in human cells.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

A retargeted recombinase for precise insertion of large DNA.

Nature biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity.

Matthew T Weirauch1, Atina Cote, Raquel Norel

  • 1Banting and Best Department of Medical Research and Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Nature Biotechnology
|January 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing 26 methods for modeling transcription factor (TF) binding specificity revealed that simple models often perform as well as complex ones. Best models derived from in vitro data matched in vivo performance for most TF sequence preferences.

More Related Videos

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)

Published on: August 21, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)

Published on: August 21, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genomic analyses rely on identifying transcription factor (TF) binding sites.
  • Numerous methods exist to model TF DNA-binding specificity, but systematic comparisons are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare 26 different approaches for modeling TF DNA-binding specificity.
  • To evaluate the performance of in vitro-derived TF motif models using in vivo data.

Main Methods:

  • Applied 26 distinct modeling approaches to in vitro protein binding microarray data for 66 mouse TFs.
  • Validated motif model performance using in vivo data for nine selected TFs.

Main Results:

  • Simple mononucleotide position weight matrix models performed comparably to complex models for most TFs.
  • In vitro-derived motifs showed similar performance to in vivo-derived motifs for the tested TFs.
  • Best-performing TF motifs often exhibited low information content, suggesting degenerate sequence preferences.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a benchmark for TF binding site modeling approaches.
  • Simple models are effective for most TF binding specificity predictions.
  • Degenerate sequence preferences are common in eukaryotic TF recognition.