Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared Identity and Patient Care: Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Biomarker Testing in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

A Framework for Locally Imputing and Predicting Biomarker Trajectories Under Irregular Monitoring: Application to Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Research square·2026
Same author

Evaluating Long-Term Health Disparity Impacts of Clinical Algorithms Using a Patient-Level Simulation Framework.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2025
Same author

Using Early Biomarker Change and Treatment Adherence to Predict Risk of Relapse Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are in Remission.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2025
Same author

The association between new cancer therapy innovations and financial toxicity.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2025
Same author

Out-of-Pocket Expenditures and Financial Hardship Among Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Transplant or Hypomethylating Agent / Supportive Care (BMT CTN 1102).

Transplantation and cellular therapy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs.

Aasthaa Bansal1, Margaret Sullivan Pepe

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. abansal@uw.edu

Lifetime Data Analysis
|January 30, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adding new predictors to risk models can improve prediction. This study evaluates study designs for assessing new predictors, finding matching improves efficiency but can reduce it for some measures. Modeling predictor distributions in controls offers significant efficiency gains.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Existing risk prediction models often require enhancement with new variables for improved predictive accuracy.
  • Biomarker research frequently involves measuring new predictors in case-control subsets of larger cohorts.
  • Evaluating the efficiency of different study designs is crucial for optimizing the inclusion of new predictors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess study designs for evaluating the predictive performance improvement from adding new predictors to existing risk models.
  • To investigate the efficiency of matching controls to cases on baseline predictors in case-control studies.
  • To compare various measures of prediction performance under different study designs.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies were employed to evaluate prediction performance measures.
  • Case-control study designs were considered for assessing new predictor inclusion.
  • Methods included analyzing the impact of matching and the number of controls per case.
  • A novel method modeling the distribution of the new predictor in controls was explored.

Main Results:

  • Matching controls to cases on baseline predictors generally improved the efficiency of most prediction performance measures.
  • Efficiency gains from matching were reduced when a higher number of controls per case were used.
  • Certain prediction performance measures experienced reduced efficiency with matching.
  • Modeling the distribution of the new predictor within the control group substantially enhanced estimation efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Case-control study designs incorporating matching can be efficient for evaluating new predictors in risk models, though careful consideration of the specific performance measure is needed.
  • The number of controls per case impacts the efficiency gains achieved through matching.
  • A method that models the distribution of the new predictor in controls presents a promising strategy for considerable improvements in estimation efficiency for risk prediction model development.