Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Payton Lin1, Thomas Lu, Fan-Gang Zeng

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, USA. paytonl@uci.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Percutaneous Image-Guided Non-Target Renal Biopsy in Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Temporal AI model predicts drivers of cell state trajectories across human aging.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Improving Compliance With Safe Sleep Guidelines for Vulnerable Patients in a Community Safety Net Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Pediatric quality & safety·2026
Same author

Percutaneous Cryoablation of Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
Same author

International expert consensus on gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss: Based on clinical trials.

Med (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Treating Hearing Loss: From Cochlear Implantation to Gene Therapy.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025

Contralateral electric masking in bilateral cochlear implants shows place-matched electrodes cause the most threshold elevation. Masking decreases as electrode separation increases, suggesting overlapping neural excitation.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cochlear Implant Technology

Background:

  • Contralateral threshold shift is a phenomenon observed in cochlear implant users.
  • Understanding central auditory system interactions is crucial for optimizing bilateral cochlear implant performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate contralateral electric masking patterns in bilateral cochlear implant users.
  • To determine the influence of electrode position and separation on masking effects.

Main Methods:

  • Bilateral cochlear implants were used to deliver masking and probe electrical stimuli.
  • Contralateral threshold shift was measured as a function of electrode difference between masking and probe sites.
  • Masker intensity and onset delay were varied.

Main Results:

More Related Videos

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

  • Maximum threshold elevation occurred with approximately place-matched masker and probe electrodes across ears.
  • Masking effects diminished significantly with increasing masker-probe electrode separation.
  • Place-dependent masking was consistent across sequentially implanted ears and unaffected by masker intensity or delay.

Conclusions:

  • Contralateral electric masking in bilateral cochlear implants exhibits place-dependent characteristics.
  • Similarities to normal-hearing masking patterns suggest overlapping neural excitation in the central auditory system.
  • Findings support comparable neural mechanisms underlying auditory processing in both normal hearing and cochlear implant users.