Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Intrafemoral Injection of Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells into Immunocompromised Mice
Published on: December 8, 2023
Gauchers disease--a reappraisal of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
1Hematology Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. itos2@nhlbi.nih.gov
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), first performed in 1984, was the first treatment approach for Gaucher's disease (GD) which had curative intent. The early successes in HSCT were soon eclipsed by the introduction of a highly effective enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), which has remained the single most widely used treatment. Experience with HSCT is limited to about 50 reported cases, mainly performed in the last century, with an overall survival around 85%. HSCT typically achieves complete correction of visceral and bony changes and can fully stabilize neurological features in otherwise progressive type II and III GD. ERT, in contrast, is completely safe and effective, but is limited by cost, incomplete resolution of visceral, hematological, and bony features in some patients, and lack of neurological correction in type II and III disease. In this review, we summarize and compare HSCT and ERT. With 20 years of experience of ERT, its limitations as well as its advantages are now well delineated. Meanwhile progress in HSCT over the last decade suggests that transplantation would today represent a very safe curative approach for GD offering one time complete correction of the disease, contrasting with the lifelong need for ERT with its associated expense and dependence on sophisticated drug manufacture. Additionally, unlike ERT, HSCT can be beneficial for neurological forms of GD. We conclude that the time has come to re-evaluate HSCT in selected patients with GD where ERT is less likely to fully eradicate symptoms of the disease.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), first performed in 1984, was the first treatment approach for Gaucher's disease (GD) which had curative intent. The early successes in HSCT were soon eclipsed by the introduction of a highly effective enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), which has remained the single most widely used treatment. Experience with HSCT is limited to about 50 reported cases, mainly performed in the last century, with an overall survival around 85%. HSCT typically achieves complete correction of visceral and bony changes and can fully stabilize neurological features in otherwise progressive type II and III GD. ERT, in contrast, is completely safe and effective, but is limited by cost, incomplete resolution of visceral, hematological, and bony features in some patients, and lack of neurological correction in type II and III disease. In this review, we summarize and compare HSCT and ERT. With 20 years of experience of ERT, its limitations as well as its advantages are now well delineated. Meanwhile progress in HSCT over the last decade suggests that transplantation would today represent a very safe curative approach for GD offering one time complete correction of the disease, contrasting with the lifelong need for ERT with its associated expense and dependence on sophisticated drug manufacture. Additionally, unlike ERT, HSCT can be beneficial for neurological forms of GD. We conclude that the time has come to re-evaluate HSCT in selected patients with GD where ERT is less likely to fully eradicate symptoms of the disease.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Multipotency of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell types that...
Hematopoiesis
Forced Transdifferentiation
Artificial transdifferentiation occurs...

