Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
[Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients]
Yuan-yuan Wang1, Cong-cong Guo, Chen Zhou
1Department of Orthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat- Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong Province, China. wyy8619@163.com
Purpose:
To investigate facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients and determine whether the patient's age and sex were influential factors in the esthetic perception for providing reference for clinical practice.
Methods:
Profile digital photographs of each patient were used. Changes in facial convexity were established by altering the position of mandible incrementally with Photoshop 7.0. Thus profile images of various degrees of mandiblular anteroposterior discrepancy for each patient was generated. Then an electronic questionnaire was designed and administered to investigate tolerable boundary values for mandibular retrognathism, tolerable boundary values for mandibular prognathism and most pleasing profiles of 203 subjects (average age 19.2±6.0 years; 70 males, 133 females). Differences between male and female profiles in the esthetic perception of patients were analyzed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test. Comparison of esthetics perception for male and female profiles regarding patient's sex and age was made by Wilcoxon rank sum test of two independent samples. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software package.
Results:
The zone of acceptability of facial convexity was 168°-180° for male model and 160°-172° for female model. The most pleasing profile was 172° for male and 168° for female. There was no significant difference between male and female patients in facial profile preferences (P>0.05). The differences in facial profile preferences between adult group and immature group were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the comparison of age groups, the adult group preferred bigger facial convexity angles than immature group for male and female retrognathia profile, male prognathia profile and male most pleasing profile.
Conclusions:
The zone of acceptability of facial convexity and the most pleasing profile exist in patients' esthetic perception of profile. There is difference between male and female profiles in the esthetic perception. The facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients are influenced by age, not by sex.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...

