Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination.

S F Bowne1

  • 1Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115.

Vision Research
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coherence determines speed discrimination.

Perception·1990
Same author

The imprecision of stereopsis.

Vision research·1990
Same author

Finding the common bond: stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities.

Vision research·1990
Same author

Motion interference in speed discrimination.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1989
Same author

Recombination of carbon monoxide to ferrous horseradish peroxidase types A and C.

Journal of molecular biology·1987
Same author

Protein states and proteinquakes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1985
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Current models assume contrast limits visual discrimination. This study found spatial frequency (SF) and temporal frequency (TF) discrimination are contrast-independent, challenging existing models of visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Vision

Background:

  • Existing models of spatial frequency (SF) and orientation discrimination rely on contrast discrimination data.
  • These models propose that peripheral noise in contrast-sensitive channels limits discrimination precision.
  • A key prediction is that all discrimination thresholds should be proportional to the contrast Weber fraction (delta c/c).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the prediction that visual discrimination thresholds are proportional to contrast.
  • To investigate the influence of contrast on spatial frequency (SF), orientation, and temporal frequency (TF) discrimination.
  • To determine the underlying noise sources limiting visual discrimination tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Increment thresholds were measured for contrast, SF, orientation, and TF.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli, procedures, and observers were kept consistent across all measurements.
  • Contrast levels ranged from 2% to 50%.

    • Main Results:

    • Contrast discrimination threshold (delta c) increased with contrast (approximately to the 0.6 power) for contrasts >= 2%.
    • SF and TF discrimination performance remained independent of contrast.
    • Orientation discrimination was nearly independent of contrast at a SF of 4 cycles per degree (cpd).

    Conclusions:

    • Error propagation models based on contrast discrimination cannot explain the observed results.
    • SF and TF discrimination, and orientation discrimination at 4 cpd, are limited by contrast-independent central noise.
    • This suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlie different visual discrimination tasks.