Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty
Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg1, Mats G Hansson, Stefan Eriksson
1Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, , Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract:
Our starting point in this article is the debate between John Harris and Iain Brassington on whether or not there is a duty to take part in scientific research. We consider the arguments that have been put forward based on fairness and a duty to rescue, and suggest an alternative justification grounded in a hypothetical agreement: that is, because effective healthcare cannot be taken for granted, but requires continuous medical research, and nobody knows what kind of healthcare they will need, participating in research should be viewed from the perspective of a social contract, based on our mutual need for medical advances.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Ethics and Bioethics
Egoism and Altruism

