Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Contingency Table01:29

Contingency Table

A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dental disease among adults with and without HIV in the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS).

BMC oral health·2026
Same author

HIV, nephrotoxic medications, and chronic kidney disease: Prevalence, risk factors, and mediation analyses among people with and without HIV enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)/ Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) combined cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of alternative times to opioid agonist treatment taper initiation on taper completion and all-cause mortality among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective population-based target trial emulation study in British Columbia, Canada, 2010-2020.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Uptake of HIV Self-testing Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Nigeria: A Secondary Observational Analysis of a Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Trial.

AIDS and behavior·2026
Same author

List randomization for prevalence estimation of sensitive behavioral data among women with HIV of reproductive age in Lilongwe, Malawi.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Negatives about positivity and consistency as conditions for causal inference.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Videos

The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients.

Daniel Westreich1, Sander Greenland

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, DUMC3967, Durham, NC 27710, USA. daniel.westreich@duke.edu

American Journal of Epidemiology
|February 2, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Presenting multiple effect estimates from a single statistical model can cause confusion. Researchers should clearly distinguish between total and direct effects to avoid misinterpretations in their findings.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Multiple adjusted effect estimates are often presented together in single tables from statistical models.
  • This practice, common in logistic regression, can lead to significant interpretative difficulties and mistaken conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and illustrate the sources of interpretative problems arising from presenting multiple effect estimates from a single model.
  • To offer practical suggestions for improving the clarity and accuracy of statistical reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized causal diagrams to visually represent the origins of interpretative challenges.
  • Analyzed potential confusion between direct and total effect estimates for exposures and covariates.
  • Examined confounding and effect measure modification in the context of single-model presentations.

Main Results:

  • Presenting exposure and confounder estimates from one model can conflate direct and total effects.
  • Covariate effect estimates may remain confounded even if the main exposure effect is not.
  • Heterogeneity of exposure effects across covariate levels further complicates interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Clear distinction between total and direct effect measures is crucial when reporting estimates from a single model.
  • Employing multiple models, each tailored to estimate specific effects (e.g., total effects for covariates), can mitigate misunderstandings.
  • Improved reporting practices are needed to prevent misinterpretations in epidemiological and statistical research.