Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
The Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Bypass (CRAB) facilitates efficient perioperative risk assessment for patients
Andrew J Meltzer1, Ashley Graham, Peter H Connolly
1Vascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. ajm9007@med.cornell.edu
Insights
A new Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score predicts 30-day major morbidity and mortality in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients undergoing bypass surgery. The CRAB score outperforms existing models for improved patient-centered decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Outcomes Research
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Existing risk assessment models are not specific to critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients undergoing bypass surgery.
- A CLI-specific tool could enhance patient-centered clinical decision-making for bypass surgery.
- Predicting 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) is crucial for CLI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel risk assessment tool, the Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score.
- To predict 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) after bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia (CLI).
- To compare the CRAB score's performance against existing general and CLI-specific risk models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 4985 individuals from the 2007-2009 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for model development and internal validation.
- Identified significant preoperative predictors of 30-day M&M through multivariate analysis.
- Assigned integer points to predictors to calculate the CRAB score; validated performance on a separate sample (n=1620) using C-index and AUC.
Main Results:
- The CRAB score identified significant predictors of M&M, including age >75, prior amputation/revascularization, tissue loss, dialysis dependence, severe cardiac disease, emergency operation, and functional dependence.
- Higher CRAB scores were significantly associated with increased rates of mortality, major morbidity, and M&M in the validation sample (P < .0001).
- The CRAB score demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting mortality, major morbidity, and M&M compared to general tools (ASA class, Surgical Risk Scale) and CLI-specific models (Finnvasc, PREVENT III).
Conclusions:
- The CRAB score is a validated, CLI-specific risk assessment instrument derived from multi-institutional data.
- The CRAB score outperforms existing prognostic indices in predicting adverse events after CLI bypass surgery.
- The CRAB score provides an evidence basis for patient-centered decision-making and may guide selection between surgical revascularization and endovascular approaches.
Objective:
Specific perioperative risk assessment models have been developed for bariatric, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery. A similar instrument, specific for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), could improve patient-centered clinical decision making. We describe a novel tool to predict 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) after bypass surgery for CLI.
Methods:
Data for 4985 individuals from the 2007 to 2009 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to develop and internally validate the model. Outcome measures included mortality, major morbidity, and a composite end point (M&M). M&M included mortality and the most severe postoperative morbidities that were highly associated with death (eg, sepsis and major cardiopulmonary complications). More than 30 preoperative factors were tested for association with 30-day mortality, major morbidity, and M&M. Significant predictors in multivariate models were assigned integer values (points), which were added to calculate a patient's Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score. Performance was assessed (C-index) across all outcome measures and compared with other general tools (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Surgical Risk Scale) and existing CLI-specific survival prediction models (Finnvasc score, Edifoligide for the Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure [PREVENT III] score) on a distinct validation sample (n = 1620).
Results:
In the derivation data set (n = 3275), the 30-day mortality rate was 2.9%. The rate of any major morbidity was 19.1%. The composite end point M&M occurred in 10.1%. Significant predictors of M&M by multivariate analysis included age >75 years, prior amputation or revascularization, tissue loss, dialysis dependence, severe cardiac disease, emergency operation, and functional dependence. Applied to a distinct validation sample of 1620 patients, higher CRAB scores were significantly associated with higher rates of mortality, all major morbidities, and M&M (P < .0001). Comparison with other models by assessment of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve revealed the CRAB was a more accurate predictor of mortality, all major morbidity, and M&M.
Conclusions:
The CRAB is a CLI-specific, risk assessment instrument derived from multi-institutional American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes data that out-performs existing prognostic risk indices in the prediction of clinically significant adverse events after bypass surgery. Use of the CRAB as a risk assessment tool provides an evidence basis for patient-centered clinical decision making and may have a role in identifying patients at higher risk for surgical revascularization in whom an endovascular approach is preferable.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
