The Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Bypass (CRAB) facilitates efficient perioperative risk assessment for patients

Andrew J Meltzer1, Ashley Graham, Peter H Connolly

  • 1Vascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. ajm9007@med.cornell.edu

Insights

A new Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score predicts 30-day major morbidity and mortality in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients undergoing bypass surgery. The CRAB score outperforms existing models for improved patient-centered decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Outcomes Research
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Existing risk assessment models are not specific to critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients undergoing bypass surgery.
  • A CLI-specific tool could enhance patient-centered clinical decision-making for bypass surgery.
  • Predicting 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) is crucial for CLI patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel risk assessment tool, the Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score.
  • To predict 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) after bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia (CLI).
  • To compare the CRAB score's performance against existing general and CLI-specific risk models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 4985 individuals from the 2007-2009 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for model development and internal validation.
  • Identified significant preoperative predictors of 30-day M&M through multivariate analysis.
  • Assigned integer points to predictors to calculate the CRAB score; validated performance on a separate sample (n=1620) using C-index and AUC.

Main Results:

  • The CRAB score identified significant predictors of M&M, including age >75, prior amputation/revascularization, tissue loss, dialysis dependence, severe cardiac disease, emergency operation, and functional dependence.
  • Higher CRAB scores were significantly associated with increased rates of mortality, major morbidity, and M&M in the validation sample (P < .0001).
  • The CRAB score demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting mortality, major morbidity, and M&M compared to general tools (ASA class, Surgical Risk Scale) and CLI-specific models (Finnvasc, PREVENT III).

Conclusions:

  • The CRAB score is a validated, CLI-specific risk assessment instrument derived from multi-institutional data.
  • The CRAB score outperforms existing prognostic indices in predicting adverse events after CLI bypass surgery.
  • The CRAB score provides an evidence basis for patient-centered decision-making and may guide selection between surgical revascularization and endovascular approaches.
Abstract