Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Exam: Image Acquisition
Published on: September 22, 2023
Identifying children at very low risk of clinically important blunt abdominal injuries
James F Holmes1, Kathleen Lillis, David Monroe
1Department Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. jfholmes@ucdavis.edu
Insights
A new prediction rule helps identify children with blunt torso trauma unlikely to need surgery for intra-abdominal injuries. This rule, based on history and physical exams, can potentially reduce the need for computed tomography (CT) scans.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Blunt torso trauma in children can lead to intra-abdominal injuries requiring acute intervention.
- Computed tomography (CT) is often used for diagnosis but involves radiation exposure.
- There is a need for accurate methods to identify children at very low risk, obviating the need for CT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive and validate a prediction rule for identifying children with blunt torso trauma at very low risk for intra-abdominal injuries requiring acute intervention.
- To determine if clinical variables alone can obviate the need for CT scans in this population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of children with blunt torso trauma across 20 emergency departments.
- Utilized binary recursive partitioning to develop a prediction rule based on history and physical examination variables.
- Included variables with acceptable interrater reliability.
Main Results:
- 12,044 children were enrolled; 6.3% had intra-abdominal injuries, with 26.7% receiving acute interventions.
- The prediction rule included 7 clinical findings (e.g., no abdominal wall trauma, GCS > 13, no abdominal tenderness).
- The rule demonstrated a high negative predictive value (99.9%) and sensitivity (97%) for identifying children not needing acute intervention.
Conclusions:
- A simple prediction rule based on 7 clinical findings can accurately identify children with blunt torso trauma at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury requiring acute intervention.
- This rule, without relying on laboratory or imaging data, may help reduce unnecessary CT scans.
- External validation is recommended before clinical implementation.
Study Objective:
We derive a prediction rule to identify children at very low risk for intra-abdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention and for whom computed tomography (CT) could be obviated.
Methods:
We prospectively enrolled children with blunt torso trauma in 20 emergency departments. We used binary recursive partitioning to create a prediction rule to identify children at very low risk of intra-abdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention (therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolization, blood transfusion for abdominal hemorrhage, or intravenous fluid for ≥2 nights for pancreatic/gastrointestinal injuries). We considered only historical and physical examination variables with acceptable interrater reliability.
Results:
We enrolled 12,044 children with a median age of 11.1 years (interquartile range 5.8, 15.1 years). Of the 761 (6.3%) children with intra-abdominal injuries, 203 (26.7%) received acute interventions. The prediction rule consisted of (in descending order of importance) no evidence of abdominal wall trauma or seat belt sign, Glasgow Coma Scale score greater than 13, no abdominal tenderness, no evidence of thoracic wall trauma, no complaints of abdominal pain, no decreased breath sounds, and no vomiting. The rule had a negative predictive value of 5,028 of 5,034 (99.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 99.7% to 100%), sensitivity of 197 of 203 (97%; 95% CI 94% to 99%), specificity of 5,028 of 11,841 (42.5%; 95% CI 41.6% to 43.4%), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.15).
Conclusion:
A prediction rule consisting of 7 patient history and physical examination findings, and without laboratory or ultrasonographic information, identifies children with blunt torso trauma who are at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention. These findings require external validation before implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation

