Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Efficacy of a chronic disease management model for patients with chronic liver failure
Alan J Wigg1, Rosemary McCormick, Rachel Wundke
1Hepatology and Liver Transplant Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia. alan.wigg@health.sa.gov.au
Insights
Chronic disease management (CDM) for chronic liver failure (CLF) patients improved outpatient attendance and quality of care but did not reduce hospitalizations or improve quality of life. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Chronic disease management
- Clinical trial methodology
Background:
- Chronic liver failure (CLF) poses significant economic burdens.
- Chronic disease management (CDM) programs are successful in other chronic conditions.
- No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated CDM for CLF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of CDM programs for CLF patients.
- To assess the impact of CDM on hospital use, outpatient attendance, disease severity, quality of life, and quality of care.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, controlled trial involving 60 CLF patients.
- Patients were randomized to either an intervention group (n=40) or usual care group (n=20).
- The 12-month intervention included delivery system redesign, self-management support, decision support, and clinical information systems.
Main Results:
- CDM did not significantly reduce liver-related hospital bed days (17.8 vs 11.0 bed days/person/year).
- Patients receiving CDM showed a 30% higher rate of outpatient care attendance (IRR, 1.3; P = .004).
- Significant improvements were observed in quality of care, including adherence to screening, vaccination guidelines, and transplant referrals (P < .05).
Conclusions:
- CDM for CLF patients increased outpatient attendance and quality of care.
- CDM did not reduce hospital admission rates, disease severity, or improve quality of life.
- Larger trials with longer follow-up are necessary to validate findings and assess cost-effectiveness.
Background & Aims:
Despite the economic impacts of chronic liver failure (CLF) and the success of chronic disease management (CDM) programs in routine clinical practice, there have been no randomized controlled trials of CDM for CLF. We investigated the efficacy of CDM programs for CLF patients in a prospective, controlled trial.
Methods:
Sixty consecutive patients with cirrhosis and complications from CLF were assigned randomly to groups given intervention (n = 40) or usual care (n = 20), from 2009 to 2010. The 12-month intervention comprised 4 CDM components: delivery system redesign, self-management support, decision support, and clinical information systems. The primary outcome was the number of days spent in a hospital bed for liver-related reasons. Secondary outcomes were rates of other hospital use measures, rate of attendance at planned outpatient care, disease severity, quality of life, and quality of care.
Results:
The intervention did not reduce the number of days patients spent in hospital beds for liver-related reasons, compared with usual care (17.8 vs 11.0 bed days/person/y, respectively; incidence rate ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-4.8; P = .39), or affect other measures of hospitalization. Patients given the intervention had a 30% higher rate of attendance at outpatient care (incidence rate ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5; P = .004) and significant increases in quality of care, based on adherence to hepatoma screening, osteoporosis and vaccination guidelines, and referral to transplant centers (P < .05 for all).
Conclusions:
In a pilot study to determine the efficacy of CDM for patients with CLF, patients receiving CDM had significant increases in attendance at outpatient centers and quality of care, compared with patients who did not receive CDM. However, CDM did not appear to reduce hospital admission rates or disease severity or improve patient quality of life. Larger trials with longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings and assess cost effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care