Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

5 points on hip resurfacing.

Edwin P Su1, Sherwin L Su

  • 1Associate Professor of Clinical Orthopaedics, Weill Cornell University Medical College, and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York. sue@hss.edu.

American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
|February 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blood Metal Ion Levels After Hip Resurfacing: A Comparison of 2 Different Implants.

Arthroplasty today·2024
Same author

Frequency and Timing of Postoperative Complications After Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty today·2024
Same author

Functional Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Virtual Mesh Imaging System With Fluoroscopy.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

Clinical outcomes and return to dance after total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing in professional dancers.

The bone & joint journal·2024
Same author

Telemedicine in Arthroplasty Patients: Which Factors Are Associated With High Satisfaction?

Arthroplasty today·2024
Same author

Golfing after Orthopaedic Surgery: A longitudinal follow-up (GOLF) study protocol.

Bone & joint open·2023
Same journal

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in the U.S. Patient Population: Prevalence and Epidemiology.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Trends in Utilization of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the United States.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

The Characteristics of Surgeons Performing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Volume Consistency, Training, and Specialization.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Review of Common Clinical Conditions of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Return to Play After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Prioritizing Neurological and Psychological Factors of the Decision-Making Algorithm.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Preoperative Corticosteroid Use for Medical Conditions is Associated with Increased Postoperative Infectious Complications and Readmissions After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Study.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
See all related articles

Hip resurfacing offers an alternative to total hip replacement for younger patients with arthritis. Careful surgical technique and awareness of metal-on-metal bearing issues are crucial for optimal outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomaterials science
  • Patient outcomes research

Background:

  • Hip resurfacing is gaining popularity for treating end-stage arthritis in active individuals.
  • It serves as an alternative to traditional total hip replacement (THR).
  • Concerns exist regarding technical challenges and long-term metal-on-metal bearing complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight key factors for achieving optimal outcomes in hip resurfacing procedures.
  • To address the challenges associated with implant positioning for surgeons new to the technique.
  • To discuss potential complications related to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces over time.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on hip resurfacing techniques and outcomes.

More Related Videos

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

  • Analysis of complications reported in studies with increasing follow-up intervals.
  • Identification of critical surgical steps and implant considerations.

    • Main Results:

    • Technical difficulties in implant positioning are a significant challenge, especially for less experienced surgeons.
    • Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces present potential risks for complications as follow-up extends.
    • Specific factors influencing surgical success and patient recovery have been identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimal outcomes in hip resurfacing depend on meticulous surgical technique and careful patient selection.
    • Awareness and mitigation of metal-on-metal bearing risks are essential for long-term success.
    • Addressing these critical factors can enhance the effectiveness of hip resurfacing as a treatment option.