Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Electric Cell-Substrate Sensing for Real-Time Evaluation of Metal-Organic Framework Toxicological Profiles
Published on: May 26, 2023
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of ceria nanoparticles on different cell lines in vitro
Laura De Marzi1, Antonina Monaco, Joaquin De Lapuente
1Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila I-67100, Italy. annamaria.poma@univaq.it.
Abstract:
Owing to their radical scavenging and UV-filtering properties, ceria nanoparticles (CeO(2)-NPs) are currently used for various applications, including as catalysts in diesel particulate filters. Because of their ability to filter UV light, CeO(2)-NPs have garnered significant interest in the medical field and, consequently, are poised for use in various applications. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of short-term (24 h) and long-term (10 days) CeO(2)-NP exposure to A549, CaCo2 and HepG2 cell lines. Cytotoxicity assays tested CeO(2)-NPs over a concentration range of 0.5 μg/mL to 5000 μg/mL, whereas genotoxicity assays tested CeO(2)-NPs over a concentration range of 0.5 μg/mL to 5000 μg/mL. In vitro assays showed almost no short-term exposure toxicity on any of the tested cell lines. Conversely, long-term CeO(2)-NP exposure proved toxic for all tested cell lines. NP genotoxicity was detectable even at 24-h exposure. HepG2 was the most sensitive cell line overall; however, the A549 line was most sensitive to the lowest concentration tested. Moreover, the results confirmed the ceria nanoparticles' capacity to protect cells when they are exposed to well-known oxidants such as H(2)O(2). A Comet assay was performed in the presence of both H(2)O(2) and CeO(2)-NPs. When hydrogen peroxide was maintained at 25 μM, NPs at 0.5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, and 500 μg/mL protected the cells from oxidative damage. Thus, the NPs prevented H(2)O(2)-induced genotoxic damage.

