Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
Correct effect size estimates for strength of association statistics: comment on Odgaard and Fowler (2010)
Abstract:
Odgaard and Fowler (2010) articulated the importance of reporting confidence intervals (CIs) on effect size estimates, and they provided useful formulas for doing so. However, one of their reported formulas, pertaining to the calculation of CIs on strength of association effect sizes (e.g., R² or η²), is erroneous. This comment identifies the error and provides 2 accurate alternatives. An illustration is presented, and the importance of authors' specification of their chosen CI estimation formula is asserted.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Significance Testing: Overview
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests