Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Deep Vein Thrombosis Induced by Stasis in Mice Monitored by High Frequency Ultrasonography
Published on: April 13, 2018
Negative impact of deep venous thrombosis on chronic venous disease
Francisco S Lozano Sánchez1, José Ramón González-Porras, Santiago Díaz Sánchez
1Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. lozano@usal.es
Insights
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) significantly worsens chronic venous disease (CVD) severity and impacts quality of life (QoL). Early DVT prevention and management are crucial for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Quality of Life Research
Background:
- Chronic venous disease (CVD) can stem from various causes.
- The impact of CVD etiology on disease severity and patient quality of life (QoL) remains unclear.
- Investigating whether deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as a cause of CVD influences its outcomes is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if CVD secondary to DVT presents different disease severity and QoL compared to non-DVT CVD.
- To compare clinical outcomes between patients with CVD caused by DVT and those with non-thrombotic CVD.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 125 patients with CVD due to DVT and 1435 patients with non-DVT CVD.
- Disease severity assessed using the CEAP classification and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS).
- Quality of life evaluated with the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ20).
Main Results:
- Patients with CVD due to DVT exhibited significantly higher disease severity (CEAP C6 grade, VCSS scores).
- Poorer quality of life was reported in DVT-related CVD patients (CIVIQ20 and SF-12 global scores).
- Statistical significance was maintained across all measured severity and QoL parameters.
Conclusions:
- A history of DVT is associated with increased clinical severity and diminished quality of life in CVD patients.
- These findings underscore the importance of DVT prevention programs.
- Implementing strategies to prevent DVT and manage its long-term consequences is recommended.
Introduction:
There are several conditions that may cause chronic venous disease (CVD). It is not known whether the aetiology of CVD can predict disease severity and quality of life (QoL). Our objective is that the severity and QoL of patients with CVD secondary to DVT is different from those without prior DVT.
Material And Methods:
We compare patients with CVD caused by DVT (n=125) and patients with non-DVT CVD (n=1435) with respect to disease severity (CEAP and Venous Clinical Severity Score-VCSS) and quality of life (Health Survey Short-Form-SF12 y Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-CIVIQ20).
Results:
Regarding to non-thrombotic CVD, patients with CVD due to DVT showed more severe disease [C6 grade (14.4% vs 3.6%) (p<0.05); score VCSS (1,33±0,65 vs 0,84±0,49) (p<0.05)] and poorer QoL [global score CIVIQ-20 (57,84±15,57 vs 65,75±14,07) (p<0.05); global score SF-12 (45,98±18,79 vs 57,79±19,64) (p<0.05).]. These differences remained statistical significant in all parameters - attributed measured at each severity score and QoL questionnaires.
Conclusion:
A history of DVT leads to worse clinical severity and quality of life in CVD patients. These data support even more the need to implement programs to prevent DVT and/or its evolutionary consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins I: Introduction
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system as it...
