Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves ejection fraction and cardiac remodelling regardless of patients' age
Michela Brambatti1, Federico Guerra, Maria Vittoria Matassini
1Cardiology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, Ancona, Italy. michelabrambatti@gmail.com
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectively improves heart failure outcomes in elderly patients. This study found CRT benefits, including left ventricular ejection fraction improvement, are comparable between older and younger heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is established for heart failure (HF) management.
- Limited data exist on CRT efficacy specifically in elderly HF populations.
- Understanding age-related differences in CRT response is crucial for treatment guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in elderly (≥75 years) versus younger (<75 years) heart failure patients.
- To compare improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between these age groups.
- To identify any age-specific differences in CRT-related clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study of 65 advanced HF patients undergoing CRT.
- Clinical assessments, MLHFQ, ECG, and echocardiography performed pre-CRT and at 3 and 12 months post-CRT.
- Patients stratified into <75 and ≥75 years subgroups for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Significant time-related improvement in LVEF observed in the overall cohort and both age subgroups.
- LVEF improvement magnitude was similar between elderly (+13.6%) and non-elderly (+7.9%) patients.
- Elderly patients showed more pronounced left ventricular diameter remodeling and QRS width reduction, with similar overall clinical improvements.
Conclusions:
- CRT demonstrates comparable efficacy in improving LVEF for both elderly and younger heart failure patients.
- Age should not be a barrier to considering CRT in eligible heart failure patients.
- CRT offers significant benefits across different age groups in advanced heart failure management.
Aims:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and reduces mortality in heart failure (HF) patients, but little data exist on the efficacy of CRT in the elderly. The aim of our study is to define CRT-related benefits in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement in two subgroups of patients (<75 and ≥75 years old) and test possible differences between these two groups.
Methods And Results:
Single-centre prospective observational study including 65 patients with optimally treated, advanced HF and indication to CRT. All patients were investigated with clinical evaluation, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), 12-lead electrocardiogram, and full echocardiographical study before CRT implant and 3 and 12 months after. Left ventricular ejection fraction showed a time-related improvement in the whole population (+10.6% over 12 months) as well as in each subgroup. The magnitude of LVEF improvement was similar in elderly and non-elderly patients (+13.6 vs. +7.9%; P = ns). Left ventricular diameters, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, New York Heart Association class, MLHFQ score, and QRS width all showed a time-related improvement in the whole population as well as in each subgroup. End-diastolic left ventricular diameter remodelling and QRS width reduction were significantly more pronounced in the elderly, whereas other clinical and instrumental secondary endpoints showed a similar improvement between ≥75 and <75 years old patients. There was no significant difference regarding mortality between elderly and non-elderly patients.
Conclusion:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is as effective in improving LVEF in elderly as in non-elderly patients. Age alone should not be a determinant to restrict resynchronization therapy in HF patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

