Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automated particulate inspection systems: strategies and implications.

J Z Knapp1, L R Abramson

  • 1Research & Development Associates, Inc., Somerset, New Jersey.

Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology : a Publication of the Parenteral Drug Association
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

This study extends automated particulate inspection validation to include Japanese systems. It analyzes how different inspection strategies impact true and false reject rates for enhanced system security.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Far-field holography of ampule contaminants.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

The effect of validation on non-destructive particle inspection.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2001
Same author

The scientific basis for visible particle inspection.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2001
Same author

Origin, result and measurement of USP "essentially free" inspection for visible contaminating particles.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2000
Same author

Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy.

The New England journal of medicine·1999
Same author

"Absolute" sterility and "absolute" freedom from particle contamination.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·1998

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
  • Quality Control Systems
  • Automated Inspection Technology

Background:

  • The 1980 Knapp and Kushner validation procedure for automated particulate inspection systems is a foundational method.
  • Current automated inspection systems, particularly imported Japanese machines, utilize diverse strategies not fully addressed by the original procedure.
  • Understanding these strategies is crucial for accurate validation and ensuring product quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the 1980 human performance-based validation procedure for automated particulate inspection systems.
  • To incorporate the operational strategies of major imported inspection systems, specifically Japanese machines.
  • To analyze the impact of different inspection strategies on validation outcomes and reject rates.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Extending the original validation procedure to accommodate new inspection machine strategies.
  • Analyzing inspection strategies based on the controlling probability: rejecting "must reject" containers versus accepting "must reject" containers.
  • Investigating the relationship between inherent particle detection capabilities and chosen inspection strategies.
  • Evaluating the effect of inspection strategy on true and false reject rates.

Main Results:

  • The study successfully extends the validation procedure to cover imported Japanese automated particulate inspection systems.
  • It identifies two primary inspection strategies: one focused on rejecting "must reject" containers and another on accepting them.
  • The inherent particle detection capability of a system dictates its inspection strategy.
  • Different strategies significantly affect the true and false reject rates.

Conclusions:

  • The extended validation procedure provides a more comprehensive framework for assessing automated particulate inspection systems.
  • Recognizing and analyzing different inspection strategies is essential for accurate performance validation.
  • The findings highlight the importance of considering system-specific capabilities when determining inspection security and optimizing reject rates.