Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Response-Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow-Up Time.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Rank-based methods for assessing equivalence/non-inferiority with assay sensitivity in a three-arm trial with ordinal endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Sample size determination for interval estimation of the prevalence of a sensitive attribute under non-randomized response models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024
Same author

Multiple assessments of non-inferiority trials with ordinal endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2023
Same author

Comparison of treatments with ordinal responses in trials with sequential monitoring and response-adaptive randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Pairwise comparisons with ordered categorical data.

Yueqiong Lin1, Siu Hung Cheung, Wai-Yin Poon

  • 1School of Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a latent normal model for comparing multiple treatments with ordered categorical outcomes, outperforming traditional methods when assumptions are violated. The new approach ensures accurate Type I error rates in clinical trial analyses.

Keywords:
familywise error ratelatent variable modellog-odds ratioordered categorical responseproportional odds model

More Related Videos

Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Clinical trials commonly compare treatment efficacy using pairwise tests.
  • Ordered categorical responses are frequent in clinical trial data.
  • Existing methods like the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test have limitations with multiple treatments and violated assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate methods for pairwise treatment comparisons with ordered categorical responses.
  • To address the limitations of existing tests when the proportional odds assumption is not met.
  • To propose and validate a superior statistical approach for multi-treatment comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test based on logistic regression (proportional odds model).
  • Extension of the test for more than two treatments.
  • Proposed latent normal model for improved accuracy and error control.
  • Simulated comparative study assessing power and Type I error rates.

Main Results:

  • The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-type test fails to control Type I error when the proportional odds assumption is invalid.
  • The proposed latent normal model demonstrates superior performance in simulations.
  • The latent normal model effectively controls the overall Type I error rate.

Conclusions:

  • The latent normal model offers a more robust and reliable strategy for pairwise treatment comparisons in clinical trials with ordered categorical data.
  • This method is particularly advantageous when standard assumptions are violated.
  • The findings support the adoption of the latent normal model for improved statistical rigor in clinical trial analysis.