Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018
Lysis matters: red cell lysis with FACS Lyse affects the flow cytometric enumeration of circulating leukemic blasts
Elisa Einwallner1, Almira Subasic, Andrea Strasser
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
The whole blood lysis method has become a standard procedure to remove red cells prior to immunophenotypic analysis of leukocytes. In the present study we investigated the influence of four different lysis protocols on the flow cytometric recovery of leukemic blasts. 32 blast cells containing blood samples were stained with anti-CD45 and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody combinations. Red cell lysis was performed with FACS Lysing Solution and BD PharmLyse™ (Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; n=32) as well as Optilyse C and IOTest 3 (Immunotech SAS, Marseille; n=15 out of 32). Flow cytometric enumeration of blasts was performed on a FACS-Canto flow cytometer. The percentage of blasts after treatment with FACS Lyse was significantly smaller than after PharmLyse™ (p<0.0001), Optilyse C (p<0.0001), or IOTest 3 (p<0.0001), respectively. The difference between PharmLyse™ and Optilyse C (p=0.93), PharmLyse™ and IOTest 3 (p=0.31), and Optilyse C and IOTest 3 (p=0.34) was not significant. These results emphasize the importance of harmonization of red cell lysis protocols for the application of flow cytometry in hematological neoplasms.
The whole blood lysis method has become a standard procedure to remove red cells prior to immunophenotypic analysis of leukocytes. In the present study we investigated the influence of four different lysis protocols on the flow cytometric recovery of leukemic blasts. 32 blast cells containing blood samples were stained with anti-CD45 and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody combinations. Red cell lysis was performed with FACS Lysing Solution and BD PharmLyse™ (Becton Dickinson and Company BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; n=32) as well as Optilyse C and IOTest 3 (Immunotech SAS, Marseille; n=15 out of 32). Flow cytometric enumeration of blasts was performed on a FACS-Canto flow cytometer. The percentage of blasts after treatment with FACS Lyse was significantly smaller than after PharmLyse™ (p<0.0001), Optilyse C (p<0.0001), or IOTest 3 (p<0.0001), respectively. The difference between PharmLyse™ and Optilyse C (p=0.93), PharmLyse™ and IOTest 3 (p=0.31), and Optilyse C and IOTest 3 (p=0.34) was not significant. These results emphasize the importance of harmonization of red cell lysis protocols for the application of flow cytometry in hematological neoplasms.
More Related Videos
09:53Automated Microfluidic Blood Lysis Protocol for Enrichment of Circulating Nucleated Cells
Published on: December 31, 2009
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018