Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Individualized two-stage multiple testing procedures with corresponding interval estimates
Arthur Cohen1, Yingqiu Ma, Harold B Sackrowitz
1Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, Hill Center, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Abstract:
Multiple testing models have become an important part of statistical applications. Typically they can be presented as having M hypotheses each of which concerns an individual parameter. In addition to testing each of these hypotheses, there is often a desire to obtain interval estimates for the parameters. The use of stepwise procedures arises because single-step procedures are extremely conservative. Unfortunately research into the construction of useful, computationally feasible interval estimates corresponding to stepwise procedures has been slow. We present an alternative method of constructing multiple testing procedures (MTPs) that easily admits corresponding interval estimates. The new method places greater focus on each hypothesis separately while still using all the data. This method is particularly effective in the dependent case. Not only do these new MTPs perform as well as commonly used stepwise procedures but they also have a practical interval property not usually shared by stepwise procedures. That is, acceptance regions have desirable convexity properties. Furthermore, interval estimates associated with these tests are easily obtained. In addition, these intervals (i) are typically shorter than those based on the Bonferroni, Scheffé, Tukey or Dunnett method when they are applicable, (ii) are less likely to contain the null point falsely than other methods do, (iii) are informative, i.e. they are all finite in the two-sided case, unlike some constructed by other methods which often are infinite, (iv) have a form of the interval property.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
