Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
A comparative study on reliability of point of care sodium and potassium estimation in a pediatric intensive care
Viswas Chhapola1, Sandeep Kumar Kanwal, Rajni Sharma
1Division of PICU, Department of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children's hospital and Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Insights
Point-of-care blood gas analyzers (BGA) underestimate sodium and potassium levels in pediatric intensive care units compared to laboratory analyzers. These discrepancies, particularly with liquid sodium heparin, present clinically unacceptable systematic bias.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Point-of-care testing (POCT) offers rapid results crucial for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) management.
- Accurate electrolyte measurements, specifically sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+), are vital for patient care.
- Comparison between POCT devices like blood gas analyzers (BGA) and central laboratory auto-analyzers (AA) is essential for validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare sodium and potassium measurements obtained via Blood Gas Analyzer (BGA) at the point of care versus traditional laboratory electrolyte analyzers in a pediatric ICU setting.
- To evaluate the clinical acceptability of discrepancies in electrolyte values between BGA and laboratory methods.
Main Methods:
- A prospective method comparison study involving 59 pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital's PICU.
- Paired venous blood samples were collected for simultaneous testing on BGA and laboratory auto-analyzers (AA).
- Data analysis followed CLSI guidelines (EP15-A2) using ACB method comparison software.
Main Results:
- Blood Gas Analyzers (BGA) significantly underestimated sodium levels (mean difference: -8.76 mmol/L, p < 0.001) compared to auto-analyzers (AA).
- Potassium levels were also underestimated by BGA (mean difference: -0.75 mmol/L, p < 0.0001) in most cases, except for hypokalemia.
- Bland Altman analysis revealed statistically significant systematic bias and wide, clinically unacceptable limits of agreement for both sodium and potassium.
Conclusions:
- Blood Gas Analyzers (BGA) demonstrate a tendency to underestimate sodium and potassium values when liquid sodium heparin is used for sampling.
- The observed systematic bias and wide limits of agreement between BGA and laboratory electrolyte analyzers are not clinically acceptable for pediatric critical care.
- Careful consideration of pre-analytical factors, such as anticoagulant choice, is crucial to ensure accurate electrolyte measurements in POCT.
Objective:
To compare sodium and potassium levels in children as done with Blood Gas Analyzer (BGA) at point of care testing in pediatric ICU vs. that done in laboratory electrolyte analyzer.
Methods:
This prospective method comparison study was done from February to April 2012 in Pediatric ICU of tertiary care hospital at Delhi. Sixty consecutive patients were tested during the period. Paired blood samples for venous blood gas to be tested on BGA and serum electrolytes to be tested on auto-analyzers (AA) were taken as per standard technique. Data was collected and 59 paired samples were analyzed for sodium and potassium levels. They were analyzed according to CLSI document EP15-A2 using ACB method comparison software.
Results:
Mean sodium measured on the BGA was 132.8 ± 12.2 mmol/L where as measured by AA was 141.5 ± 11.1 mmol/L. The mean difference between the two was -8.76 mmol/L (p < 0.001). The difference was statistically significant in all three subgroups of hypernatremia, isonatremia and hyponatremia (p < 0.001). Potassium level in BGA was 3.53 ± 0.81 mmol/L and AA was 4.28 ± 1.05 mmol/L. The mean difference between the BGA and AA was -0.75 mmol/L (p < 0.0001). The difference was statistically significant in patients with normokalemia and hyperkalemia (p < 0.0001). The difference was non significant in patients with hypokalemia (p = 0.051).
Conclusions:
Blood gas analyzers underestimates Na + and K + values if sampling is done using liquid sodium heparin and if all other potential pre-analytical errors of testing are taken care of. The Bland Altman's analysis in the present study showed a significant systematic bias and very wide limits of agreement for both sodium and potassium, which is not clinically acceptable.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
