Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Lumpectomy versus mastopexy--a post-surgery patient survey
Christian Eichler1, Marit Kolsch, Axel Sauerwald
1Brustzentrum, Krankenhaus Holweide, Neufelder Str. 32, 51067 Köln, Germany. ceichler@gmail.com
Anticancer Research
|February 9, 2013
Summary
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastopexy (MP) offer similar patient satisfaction for tumor removal. BCS resulted in less scar tissue compared to MP, making it a preferred option for many patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncoplastic surgery
- Plastic surgery
- Breast surgery outcomes
Background:
- Subjective outcome evaluation is crucial in oncoplastic surgery for both breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy patients.
- This study expands evaluation to compare mastopexy (MP) and BCS, particularly when MP offers simultaneous breast enhancement.
- Comparing outcomes is vital as MP may improve subjective results by combining tumor removal with aesthetic enhancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the subjective post-surgical outcomes of mastopexy (MP) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for single-locus tumor removal.
- To evaluate patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic results, scarring, and quality of life after MP and BCS.
- To determine if MP, when combined with tumor removal, offers a superior subjective outcome compared to standard BCS.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 143 patients undergoing either MP or BCS for single-locus tumors were evaluated.
- A questionnaire assessed post-surgical body image and satisfaction in 71 patients.
- Key outcome measures included overall satisfaction, cosmetic outcome, scar tissue, breast shape/size, swelling, nipple sensitivity, and quality of life.
Main Results:
- Overall patient satisfaction was high and comparable between BCS (87%) and MP (86%) groups (p=0.48).
- Significant differences were observed in scar tissue evaluation, with BCS patients reporting higher satisfaction (77% very satisfied) compared to MP patients (44% very satisfied) (p=0.013).
- No significant differences were found in overall cosmetic outcome, breast shape/size, post-surgical swelling, nipple sensitivity, or quality of life.
Conclusions:
- Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) generally leads to less scar tissue and shorter procedures, favoring BCS for patient preference.
- While overall satisfaction is similar, BCS shows superior patient evaluation of scar tissue compared to mastopexy (MP).
- MP can be a viable option when simultaneous breast enhancement is desired, with minimal impact on overall patient satisfaction.