Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Staged endovascular and surgical treatment of slow-flow vulvar venous malformations
Naiem Nassiri1, Teresa M J O, Robert J Rosen
1Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, New York, NY, USA. naiemn@gmail.com
Objective:
The objective of the study was to report our experience in a rare series of treated symptomatic slow-flow vulvar venous malformations (VVMs) using a staged, multidisciplinary approach.
Study Design:
Consecutive patients with symptomatic lesions treated over a 7 year period (2005-2012) were followed up for technical success, resolution of symptoms, aesthetic outcomes, and complications. Direct endovenous sclerotherapy (DEVS) using sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) foam was performed in all patients under ultrasound and contrast-enhanced fluoroscopic guidance. Surgical excision and layered primary closure was performed within 24 hours after the last DEVS session.
Results:
Eleven patients (mean age, 25 years; range, 4-43 years) were treated. Presenting symptoms included pain (n = 11), soft tissue swelling (n = 11), local heaviness (n = 11), dyspareunia (n = 2), and dysmenorrhea (n = 2). Most were isolated lesions (n = 8). There were 2 cases of Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome and 1 case of Maffucci syndrome. The latter required Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation prior to sclerotherapy. On average, approximately 3 DEVS sessions were required prior to surgical excision (range, 1-6). Mean estimated surgical blood loss was 130 mL (range, 20-400 mL). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 3-55 months). Elimination of pain and soft tissue redundancy was achieved in all patients with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. All patients experienced minor pain and swelling after DEVS. Following surgical excision, there was 1 case of hematoma and wound dehiscence requiring surgical evacuation. No other reinterventions, endovascular or surgical, were required.
Conclusion:
VVMs require increased awareness and appropriate preoperative evaluation for proper identification and treatment. A multidisciplinary approach can provide improvement in clinical signs and symptoms with satisfactory cosmesis and minimal complications.
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...

