Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
X-linked Traits01:19

X-linked Traits

In most mammalian species, females have two X sex chromosomes and males have an X and Y. As a result, mutations on the X chromosome in females may be masked by the presence of a normal allele on the second X. In contrast, a mutation on the X chromosome in males more often causes observable biological defects, as there is no normal X to compensate. Trait variations arising from mutations on the X chromosome are called “X-linked”.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Δ<sup>9</sup> Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabis extracts differentially improve adipoinsular dysfunction in diet-induced obesity.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same author

Retrodiction in Evolutionary Genomics: A Philosophical Perspective.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Reversing Pathophysiology in Fragile X Syndrome Mice by Promoting PGC-1α and Mitochondrial Functions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mice from lines selectively bred for innately high activity levels have altered behavioral and energetic responses to repeated sleep deprivation.

Physiology & behavior·2026
Same author

Mice bred for increased running distance evolve 3D shape differences in the hind limb skeleton but show limited plasticity in response to voluntary exercise.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

Modular adaptation of the ribcage in response to artificial selection for endurance running.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same journal

THE EXPOSOME IN HUMAN EVOLUTION: FROM DUST TO DIESEL.

The Quarterly review of biology·2020
Same journal

PRINCIPLES AND PATTERNS OF BAT MOVEMENTS: FROM AERODYNAMICS TO ECOLOGY.

The Quarterly review of biology·2018
Same journal

Review of Methods in Enzymology Volumes 551 and 552 Circadian Rhythms and Biological Clocks, Part A and B Edited by Amita Sehgal.

The Quarterly review of biology·2018
Same journal

Competition for vitamin B1 (thiamin) structures numerous ecological interactions.

The Quarterly review of biology·2018
Same journal

New Weapons in the Toad Toolkit: A Review of Methods to Control and Mitigate the Biodiversity Impacts of Invasive Cane Toads (Rhinella Marina).

The Quarterly review of biology·2018
Same journal

Landscape Demography: Population Change and its Drivers Across Spatial Scales.

The Quarterly review of biology·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Male superiority in spatial navigation: adaptation or side effect?

Edward K Clint1, Elliott Sober, Theodore Garland

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA. ECLINT@UCLA.EDU

The Quarterly Review of Biology
|February 13, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sex differences in spatial cognition are not explained by home range size adaptation. Hormonal side effects offer a better explanation for these cognitive variations in spatial navigation abilities.

More Related Videos

A Video Demonstration of Preserved Piloting by Scent Tracking but Impaired Dead Reckoning After Fimbria-Fornix Lesions in the Rat
08:37

A Video Demonstration of Preserved Piloting by Scent Tracking but Impaired Dead Reckoning After Fimbria-Fornix Lesions in the Rat

Published on: April 24, 2009

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

A Video Demonstration of Preserved Piloting by Scent Tracking but Impaired Dead Reckoning After Fimbria-Fornix Lesions in the Rat
08:37

A Video Demonstration of Preserved Piloting by Scent Tracking but Impaired Dead Reckoning After Fimbria-Fornix Lesions in the Rat

Published on: April 24, 2009

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Comparative Cognition
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sex differences in spatial cognition are frequently attributed to natural selection and differing home range sizes.
  • The 'male superiority effect' in spatial tasks lacks robust evidence linking it to adaptive pressures.
  • Alternative explanations, such as hormonal side effects, remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the 'home range hypothesis' for sex differences in spatial cognition using a cross-species comparative approach.
  • To test whether species differences in home range size dimorphism correlate with spatial navigation ability differences.
  • To assess the viability of hormonal side effects as an alternative explanation.

Main Methods:

  • Phylogenetically informed comparative analysis across multiple species.
  • Statistical evaluation of the association between home range size dimorphism and spatial navigation abilities.
  • Comparison of support for the adaptation hypothesis versus the hormonal side effect hypothesis.

Main Results:

  • No significant support was found for the hypothesis that larger home range size differences between sexes drive spatial ability divergence.
  • Species exhibiting greater sexual dimorphism in home range size did not show parallel differences in spatial navigation.
  • Data provided stronger support for the hypothesis that hormonal side effects contribute to sex differences in spatial cognition.

Conclusions:

  • The traditional adaptationist explanation based on home range size is not supported by cross-species comparative data.
  • Hormonal influences present a more plausible alternative mechanism for the evolution of sex differences in spatial cognition.
  • Future research should focus on the role of hormonal factors in shaping cognitive sex differences.