Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
The burden of guilt: heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality
Maryam Kouchaki1, Francesca Gino2, Ata Jami3
1Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University.
Abstract:
Drawing on the embodied simulation account of emotional information processing, we argue that the physical experience of weight is associated with the emotional experience of guilt and thus that weight intensifies the experience of guilt. Across 4 studies, we found that participants who wore a heavy backpack experienced higher levels of guilt compared to those who wore a light backpack. Additionally, wearing a heavy backpack affected participants' behavior. Specifically, it led them to be more likely to choose healthy snacks over guilt-inducing ones and boring tasks over fun ones. It also led participants to cheat less. Importantly, self-reported guilt mediated the effect of wearing a heavy backpack on these behaviors. Our studies also examined the mechanism behind these effects and demonstrated that participants processed guilty stimuli more fluently when experiencing physical weight.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Cognitive Dissonance
Beck's Cognitive Therapy
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Social Traps

