Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Muscles for Facial Expressions

Muscles for Facial Expressions

The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

Cranial Nerves: Types Part I

Cranial Nerves: Types Part I

Cranial nerves are responsible for transmitting motor and sensory information between the brain and various parts of the body. There are twelve pairs of cranial nerves, with the first six being essential in sensory perception, motor control, and autonomic functions related to the head and neck.
Olfactory Nerve (Cranial Nerve I)
The olfactory nerve, or cranial nerve I, is unique as it is purely sensory and dedicated to the sense of smell. This nerve originates in the olfactory epithelium of the...

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

Accessory Structures of the Eye

Accessory Structures of the Eye

Optical perception, or vision, is an extraordinary sense dependent on converting light signals received via the ocular organs. These organs, known as eyes, are securely positioned within the bony cavities of the skull, called orbits. The orbits serve a dual purpose: a protective shield for the ocular globes and a stable attachment point for the soft ocular tissues. The eye's external protective mechanisms include the eyelids, which are edged with lashes that act as a barrier against foreign...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Bond-length-driven magnetic transition in quasi-one-dimensional CrSb<i>X</i><sub>3</sub>(<i>X</i>=S, Se).

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same author

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

Leveraging ubiquitous mobile sensors to track infant expressions and movements.

Infant behavior & development·2026

Same author

Not All Authors Are Equal: Moral Judgments of Plagiarism From AI and Human Sources.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026

Same author

Emotional consistency guides social engagement in 18- to 24-month-old toddlers.

Child development·2026

Same author

Evidence of Top-Down Sensory Prediction in Neonates Within 2 Days of Birth.

Developmental science·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing.

Naiqi G Xiao¹, Paul C Quinn, Liezhong Ge

¹Dr. Eric Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|February 13, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Moving faces, unlike static ones, enhance part-based face processing. This research shows elastic facial motion shifts focus from holistic to featural recognition in dynamic contexts.

More Related Videos

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Vision Science

Background:

Decades of face processing research primarily use static images.
Limited understanding exists regarding face processing in real-world, dynamic contexts.
Static face processing research often emphasizes holistic (whole-face) recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate holistic versus part-based face processing in elastic moving faces.
To determine if dynamic facial motion facilitates holistic or part-based processing compared to static faces.
To explore the impact of facial motion on established face recognition paradigms.

Main Methods:

Utilized the composite paradigm to assess face processing.
Participants remembered either elastic moving faces (blinking, chewing) or static faces.
Tested recognition using static composite faces after encoding dynamic or static stimuli.

Main Results:

The composite effect was significantly smaller for dynamic faces than static faces.
This effect of dynamic faces was consistent across various encoding times.
Part-based processing was facilitated by elastic facial motion, not holistic processing.

Conclusions:

Elastic facial motion promotes part-based (featural) face processing over holistic processing.
Findings suggest a shift in face processing strategies when encountering dynamic, real-world faces.
Highlights the importance of featural processing in understanding dynamic face recognition.