Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Surgical Management of Meatal Stenosis with Meatoplasty
Published on: November 30, 2010
What is the efficacy of circumcision in boys with complex urinary tract abnormalities?
Mohammed Bader1, Liam McCarthy
1Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Insights
Circumcision may reduce urinary tract infection (UTI) risk by 90% in boys with congenital urinary tract abnormalities. This review assesses the risk/benefit ratio for this intervention in such cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Intervention
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) pose a 1% risk in healthy boys.
- Congenital urinary tract abnormalities significantly elevate UTI risk, potentially leading to severe complications like urosepsis and chronic kidney disease.
- UTIs in affected boys can result in renal scarring, pyelonephritis, chronic renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of circumcision in boys with congenital urinary tract abnormalities.
- To determine the efficacy of circumcision as an intervention to reduce UTI risk in this specific pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence on UTI risk in boys with congenital urinary tract abnormalities.
- Analysis of studies examining the efficacy of circumcision in reducing UTI rates.
- Assessment of the risk/benefit profile of circumcision for this patient group.
Main Results:
- Circumcision demonstrates a potential 90% reduction in UTI risk among normal boys.
- Evidence regarding circumcision's efficacy in boys with specific congenital abnormalities requires further clinical evaluation.
- Calculating the precise risk/benefit ratio necessitates understanding individual UTI risk and circumcision efficacy in each condition.
Conclusions:
- Circumcision is a potential intervention to mitigate UTI, urosepsis, and renal scarring risks in boys with congenital urinary tract abnormalities.
- Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines for circumcision in this high-risk pediatric population.
- Clinicians require comprehensive data to counsel effectively on the risks and benefits of circumcision for boys with urinary tract anomalies.
Abstract:
The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in normal boys is 1%. This risk is significantly increased in boys with congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract, which includes such abnormalities as vesico-ureteric reflux, obstructive megaureter (VUJO) and posterior urethral valves. UTI in these boys can lead to urosepsis, a potentially life-threatening complication, and in the longer term renal scarring complicating pyelonephritis can lead to chronic renal impairment or even end-stage renal disease. Circumcision has been shown in normal boys to reduce the risk of UTI by 90%, and potentially could be a simple intervention to reduce the risk of urosepsis and renal scarring. In order to make this decision a clinician really needs to have the answers to two questions: 1) What is the risk of UTI in this particular boy? 2) What is the evidence of efficacy of circumcision in this particular condition? This article reviews what evidence exists to make a calculation of the risk/benefit ratio for circumcision in boys with abnormalities of the urinary tract.
Related Concept Videos
Microbiota of the Urogenital Tract
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction

