Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The inter-group comparison-intra-group cooperation hypothesis: comparisons between groups increase efficiency in
Robert Böhm1, Bettina Rockenbach
1Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Plos One
|February 14, 2013
Summary
Introducing inter-group comparison significantly boosts cooperation and efficiency in public goods provision. This method enhances group collaboration without the high costs of direct conflict, leading to better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Behavioral Economics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Public goods provision is crucial for societies, but achieving cooperation and efficiency is challenging.
- Existing methods to boost cooperation, like inter-group conflict, often reduce overall efficiency due to associated costs.
- A need exists for methods that leverage cooperation benefits without incurring detrimental conflict costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a novel method for enhancing cooperation and efficiency in public goods provision.
- To test if mere inter-group comparison, without structural conflict, can increase intra-group cooperation and collective efficiency.
- To determine the impact of inter-group comparison across different group sizes and benefit structures.
Main Methods:
- Experimental manipulation of contribution feedback (intra-group only vs. intra- and inter-group).
- Comparison of cooperation levels in different provision environments (small vs. large groups).
- Analysis of participant behavior under conditions of intra-group and inter-group comparison.
Main Results:
- Groups with inter-group comparison opportunities showed significantly higher cooperation levels than those without.
- Inter-group comparison motivated participants to contribute more, preventing a decline in contributions.
- The positive effects of cooperation were directly translated into increased overall efficiency.
Conclusions:
- Mere inter-group comparison is an effective strategy to enhance cooperation and efficiency in public goods provision.
- This method avoids the efficiency-reducing costs associated with structural inter-group conflict.
- The findings have practical implications for designing cooperative systems in various societal contexts.
Related Concept Videos
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
01:31In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
00:52Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
01:37Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
00:57Inclusive Fitness
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.