Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Polymalic Acid-based Nano Biopolymers for Targeting of Multiple Tumor Markers: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine?
Published on: June 13, 2014
Targeting multiplicity: the key factor for anti-cancer nanoparticles
M Gary-Bobo1, O Vaillant, M Maynadier
1Institut des Biomolecules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247 CNRS-UM1-UM2, 15 Avenue Charles Flahault, BP 14491, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 05, France.
Abstract:
In this mini-review, we focus on different strategies to bring nanotools specifically to cancer cells. We discuss about a better targeting of tumor, combining the characteristics of tumor environment, the increase in nanoparticles life time, the biomarkers overexpressed on cancer cells and different physical methods for non invasive therapies. Here we detail the necessity of a synergy between passive and active targeting for an actual specificity of cancer cells.
Insights
This review explores strategies for delivering nanomedicines to cancer cells. It highlights combining tumor environment characteristics, nanoparticle longevity, cancer biomarkers, and physical methods for effective cancer targeting.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nanotechnology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Effective cancer treatment requires precise delivery of therapeutic agents to tumor sites.
- Nanoparticles offer potential for targeted drug delivery but face challenges in reaching cancer cells specifically.
- Current strategies often lack the necessary specificity, leading to off-target effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze diverse strategies for enhancing the targeting of nanomedicines to cancer cells.
- To discuss the integration of tumor microenvironment features, nanoparticle properties, and external stimuli for improved cancer cell specificity.
- To emphasize the synergistic potential of passive and active targeting approaches in nanomedicine for cancer therapy.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of current nanomedicine targeting strategies.
- Analysis of passive targeting mechanisms (e.g., enhanced permeability and retention effect).
- Evaluation of active targeting approaches utilizing biomarkers and physical methods for non-invasive therapies.
Main Results:
- Combining passive and active targeting strategies significantly enhances nanomedicine specificity for cancer cells.
- Leveraging tumor microenvironment characteristics and overexpressed biomarkers improves nanoparticle accumulation and retention.
- Physical methods offer non-invasive means to guide and activate nanomedicines at the tumor site.
Conclusions:
- A multifaceted approach integrating passive and active targeting is crucial for achieving high specificity in cancer nanomedicine.
- Optimizing nanoparticle design and understanding tumor biology are key to successful cancer cell targeting.
- Synergistic strategies promise to improve the efficacy and safety of nanotherapeutics in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Site-Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: Polymeric Carriers
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Site-Targeted
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...

