Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Differential Staining Technique01:26

Differential Staining Technique

Differential staining is an essential microbiological technique that exploits variations in cell wall structures to classify and identify microorganisms. It facilitates the distinction of bacteria, aiding in diagnostic and research applications. Two of the most widely used differential staining methods are Gram staining and acid-fast staining, both of which rely on the chemical and structural differences in bacterial cell walls.Gram Staining TechniqueGram staining differentiates bacteria by...
Methods of Classification and Identification01:28

Methods of Classification and Identification

Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...
Methods to Assess Microbial Populations01:30

Methods to Assess Microbial Populations

Assessing microbial populations is crucial for understanding microbial roles in health, ecology, and industry. Various complementary techniques—both culture-based and molecular—enable detailed analysis of microbial abundance, diversity, and function.Viable Plate CountThe viable plate count is a traditional culture-based method used to estimate the number of living microbes in a sample. After serial dilution, the sample is spread onto nutrient agar plates. Each viable cell forms a visible...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Therapeutic potential of ELABELA in alleviating hereditary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Journal of advanced research·2026
Same author

Piezo1: A potential therapeutic target for endothelial dysfunction-related diseases.

Life sciences·2026
Same author

ELABELA Protects Against Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Maintaining Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Homeostasis and Regulating NETosis.

Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2026
Same author

Dual-Pathway Sequential Transcytosis Unlocks Enhanced Tumor Penetration and Efficacy of Mitochondria-Targeted Nanodrugs.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Urolithin A alleviates vascular remodeling through mitochondrial SIRT3-mediated SOD2 deacetylation and antioxidation in hypertensive rats.

Redox report : communications in free radical research·2026
Same author

Impaired retinoic acid signaling mediated Rbm20 downregulation induces aberrant splicing of Ca<sub>V</sub>1.2 calcium channel: implications in myocardial hypertrophy.

Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Identification of Mycobacterium Species by DNA Microarray Chip Method
06:27

Identification of Mycobacterium Species by DNA Microarray Chip Method

Published on: June 24, 2025

Comparative evaluation of two rapid methods for differentiating mycobacteria.

Xiaomao Yin1, Lei Zheng, Lijuan Wu

  • 1Laboratory Medical Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, PR China.

Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
|February 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Two new methods, duplex real-time PCR and MPB64 assay, rapidly differentiate mycobacteria. Duplex real-time PCR showed higher accuracy for clinical isolates, while both methods demonstrated excellent agreement.

More Related Videos

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening
15:28

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening

Published on: January 17, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Identification of Mycobacterium Species by DNA Microarray Chip Method
06:27

Identification of Mycobacterium Species by DNA Microarray Chip Method

Published on: June 24, 2025

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening
15:28

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening

Published on: January 17, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Diagnostic Assays

Background:

  • Rapid and accurate differentiation of mycobacteria is crucial for effective treatment and control of tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections.
  • Conventional biochemical methods are time-consuming and may lack specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of two newly developed rapid methods: duplex real-time PCR and MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay.
  • To compare these methods for differentiating Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Main Methods:

  • Duplex real-time PCR utilizing specific primer sets.
  • MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay.
  • Comparison with conventional biochemical techniques as the gold standard.

Main Results:

  • Both duplex real-time PCR and MPB64 assay correctly identified all reference strains.
  • For clinical isolates, duplex real-time PCR achieved 100% accuracy, slightly higher than the MPB64 assay (97.9%).
  • Excellent agreement was observed between the two methods (Kappa = 0.957), with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Duplex real-time PCR offers greater potential for mycobacterial differentiation in clinical laboratories.
  • The MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay is a convenient alternative for small sample numbers.
  • Both methods provide rapid and reliable differentiation of mycobacteria.